Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31148622›Full record

ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2018

Bridging the gap from the oncology setting to community care through a cross-Canada environmental scan.

Danielle M Wittal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Determinants of supportive care experiences for women living with breast cancer in rural communities of British Columbia.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  8. Toward equitably high-quality cancer survivorship care.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  9. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Danielle M WittalDanielle M. Wittal (Principal Researcher), Radiation Therapist (RTT), Masters of Science (MSc), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Centre for the Southern Interior Kelowna, British Columbia, 2118 Crosshill Drive, Kamloops, BC V1S 0C6, Danielle.wittal@bccancer.bc.ca; dwwittal@gmail.com, Tel: 778-220-8822.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the growing number of cancer survivors, there is a need to evaluate the provision of follow-up care to ensure the needs of patients are met. An environmental scan was conducted provincially and nationally, which aimed to gain a broader understanding of survivorship care, highlight any trends, and report disparities in care during the transition from the oncology to the community setting. The environmental scan involved gathering data from nine out of 10 provinces through telephone interviews, seeking relevant documentation, and identifying areas of good practice. There was a wide variation in practice across the provinces and some recommendations for improving care are made. Findings emphasize the need to promote increased patient self-management and self-advocacy. Implications from the study are that cancer survivorship is a complex topic that requires communication and coordination across services to ensure a seamless transition.

Identifiers

PMID31148622
PMCPMC6516218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.