Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31148617›Full record

ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2019

Holding conversations with cancer patients about sexuality: Perspectives from Canadian and African healthcare professionals.

Johanna Maree, Margaret I Fitch

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring online discussions in men with testicular cancer: a qualitative and sentiment analysis of Reddit posts.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johanna MareeDepartment of Nursing Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Margaret I FitchL Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment can have a significant impact on an individual's sexuality. However, cancer survivors are reporting that very few healthcare professionals are talking with them about the topic. This work was undertaken to gain an increased understanding about the dialogue between cancer care professionals and cancer patients regarding the topic of sexuality. It was anticipated the effort would allow the identification of barriers that could limit dialogue between patients and healthcare providers, as well as offer insight regarding how to overcome such barriers in busy clinical settings. A Canadian sample of 34 healthcare professionals were interviewed and 27 African nurses engaged in a focus group discussion. A content analysis revealed similarities in terms of personal discomfort with the topic and feeling unprepared to discuss it with patients. There were notable differences between the two samples in terms of the barriers related to culture and tradition. African nurses reported significant cultural barriers, stigma and discrimination influencing conversations about sexuality with cancer patients in contrast to their Canadian counterparts.

Identifiers

PMID31148617
PMCPMC6516239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.