Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31148383›Full record

SynthesisEarly intervention in psychiatry2020

Role of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cerebral glutathione quantification for youth mental health: A systematic review.

Emily Fisher, John Gillam, Rachel Upthegrove, Sarah Aldred, Stephen J Wood

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. In Vivo Brain GSH: MRS Methods and Clinical Applications.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily FisherSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-7738
John GillamOrygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel UpthegroveInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Sarah AldredSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Stephen J WoodOrygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Birmingham · GBBirmingham City University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOxidative stress is strongly implicated in many psychiatric disorders, which has resulted in the development of new interventions to attempt to perturb this pathology. A great deal of attention has been paid to glutathione, which is the brain's dominant antioxidant and plays a fundamental role in removing free radicals and other reactive oxygen species. Measurement of glutathione concentration in the brain in vivo can provide information on redox status and potential for oxidative stress to develop. Glutathione might also represent a marker to assess treatment response.

methodsThis paper systematically reviews studies that assess glutathione concentration (measured using magnetic resonance spectroscopy) in various mental health conditions.

resultsThere is limited evidence showing altered brain glutathione concentration in mental disorders; the best evidence suggests glutathione is decreased in depression, but is not altered in bipolar disorder. The review then outlines the various methodological options for acquiring glutathione data using spectroscopy.

conclusionsAnalysis of the minimum effect size measurable in existing studies indicates that increased number of participants is required to measure subtle but possibly important differences and move the field forward.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainGlutathioneHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMental DisordersGlutathioneglutathionemagnetic resonance spectroscopyyouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID31148383
PMCPMC7065077
OpenAlexW2947602706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.