Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31148312›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2019

Health promotion for mild frailty based on behaviour change: Perceptions of older people and service providers.

Christina Avgerinou, Benjamin Gardner, Kalpa Kharicha, Rachael Frost, Ann Liljas, Rekha Elaswarapu, Jill Manthorpe, Vari M Drennan, Claire Goodman, Steve Iliffe and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reliability and Validity of the Function-Focused Care Checklist for Caregivers.Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina AvgerinouDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1445-1676
Benjamin GardnerDepartment of Psychology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-5934
Kalpa KharichaDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2975-2084
Rachael FrostDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3523-0052
Ann LiljasDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2358-6046
Rekha ElaswarapuAge UK Ealing (Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement representative), London, UK.
Jill ManthorpeSocial Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-1410
Vari M DrennanCentre for Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8915-5185
Claire GoodmanCentre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-4893
Steve IliffeDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2806-3997
Kate WaltersDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2173-2430
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBAge UK · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/1021/02Department of Health HTA/12/192/10Health Technology Assessment programme of the National Institute for Health ResearchNIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild frailty is common among older people, but it is potentially reversible with health promotion interventions. Behaviour change may be a key to preventing progression of frailty; however, we know little about what interventions work best and how a behaviour change approach would be perceived by this group. The aim of this study was to explore how mildly frail older people perceive health promotion based on behaviour change and what factors affect engagement with this approach. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 older people with mild frailty who received a pilot home-based behaviour change health promotion service, including a dyad of older person/family carer, and two service providers delivering the service in two diverse areas of South England. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. The concept of goal setting was acceptable to most participants, though the process of goal setting needed time and consideration. Goals on maintaining independence, monitoring of progress and receiving feedback were reported to increase motivation. Physical/mental capability and knowledge/perception of own needs were main determinants of the type of goals chosen by participants as well as the approach used by the project workers. Older people with complex needs benefited from care coordination, with a combination of goal setting and elements of social, practical and emotional support in varying proportions. Mildly frail older people responded well to a behaviour change approach to promote health and well-being. Further consideration is needed of the most effective strategies based on complexity of needs, and how to overcome barriers among people with cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior TherapyCaregiversEnglandFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHealth PromotionHumansMaleMotor Activitybehaviour change techniquesfrailtygoal settinghealth promotionqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID31148312
PMCPMC6771617
OpenAlexW2947574440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.