Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31148311›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Machine learning identifies unaffected first-degree relatives with functional network patterns and cognitive impairment similar to those of schizophrenia patients.

Rixing Jing, Peng Li, Zengbo Ding, Xiao Lin, Rongjiang Zhao, Le Shi, Hao Yan, Jinmin Liao, Chuanjun Zhuo, Lin Lu and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Markers of Schizophrenia-A Critical Narrative Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rixing JingNational Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peng LiInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Zengbo DingNational Institute on Drug Dependence and Beijing Key laboratory of Drug Dependence, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Xiao LinInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Rongjiang ZhaoDepartment of Alcohol and Drug Dependence, Beijing Hui-Long-Guan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Le ShiInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Hao YanInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jinmin LiaoInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chuanjun ZhuoTianjin Mental Health Center, Nankai University Affiliated Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lin LuInstitute of Mental Health, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yong FanDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9869-4685
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNNankai University · CNUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Personalized Functional Network Modeling to Characterize and Predict Psychopathology in YouthR01EB022573 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Yong Fan, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
Mapping Heterogeneity of Neuroanatomical Imaging Signatures of Psychosis via Pattern AnalysisR01MH112070 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
National Basic Research Program of China 2015CB856400National Natural Science Foundation of China 61473296National Natural Science Foundation of China 81501158NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022573NIH HHS EB022573NIH HHS MH112070NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) patients and their unaffected first-degree relatives (FDRs) share similar functional neuroanatomy. However, it remains largely unknown to what extent unaffected FDRs with functional neuroanatomy patterns similar to patients can be identified at an individual level. In this study, we used a multivariate pattern classification method to learn informative large-scale functional networks (FNs) and build classifiers to distinguish 32 patients from 30 healthy controls and to classify 34 FDRs as with or without FNs similar to patients. Four informative FNs-the cerebellum, default mode network (DMN), ventral frontotemporal network, and posterior DMN with parahippocampal gyrus-were identified based on a training cohort and pattern classifiers built upon these FNs achieved a correct classification rate of 83.9% (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 80.0%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.914) estimated based on leave-one-out cross-validation for the training cohort and a correct classification rate of 77.5% (sensitivity 72.5%, specificity 82.5%, and AUC 0.811) for an independent validation cohort. The classification scores of the FDRs and patients were negatively correlated with their measures of cognitive function. FDRs identified by the classifiers as having SCZ patterns were similar to the patients, but significantly different from the controls and FDRs with normal patterns in terms of their cognitive measures. These results demonstrate that the pattern classifiers built upon the informative FNs can serve as biomarkers for quantifying brain alterations in SCZ and help to identify FDRs with FN patterns and cognitive impairment similar to those of SCZ patients.

Indexed as

FamilyMachine LearningAdultBiomarkersCerebellumCerebral CortexCognitive DysfunctionConnectomeFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPattern Recognition, AutomatedSchizophreniaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkerscognitive impairmentfunctional networksmachine learningpattern classificationresting-state functional magnetic resonance imagingunaffected first-degree relatives

Identifiers

PMID31148311
PMCPMC6679781
OpenAlexW2947362929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.