ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2019
Inaccurate secondary structure predictions often indicate protein fold switching.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fold-Switching Proteins.Annual review of biophysics · 2026Review
- Structural and mechanistic divergence in LL-37, HNP-1, and Magainin-2: An integrated computational and biophysical analysis.Current research in structural biology · 2025Article
- Fold-switching proteins.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Unveiling the cold reality of metamorphic proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Temperature-dependent fold-switching mechanism of the circadian clock protein KaiB.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Fluid protein fold space and its implications.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023Article
- Metamorphic protein folding as evolutionary adaptation.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2023Review
- Distinguishing features of fold-switching proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Review
- Many dissimilar NusG protein domains switch between α-helix and β-sheet folds.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Prediction and confirmation of a switch-like region within the N-terminal domain of hSIRT1.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022Article
- AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Design and discovery of metamorphic proteins.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- A high-throughput predictive method for sequence-similar fold switchers.Biopolymers · 2021Article
- A sequence-based method for predicting extant fold switchers that undergo α-helix ↔ β-strand transitions.Biopolymers · 2021Article
- Predictable fold switching by the SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF9b.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
- Secondary Structure of the Novel Myosin Binding Domain WYR and Implications within Myosin Structure.Biology · 2021Article
- Metamorphic proteins: the Janus proteins of structural biology.Open biology · 2021Article
- Functional and Regulatory Roles of Fold-Switching Proteins.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2021Review
- Evolution of fold switching in a metamorphic protein.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Sequence-Based Prediction of Metamorphic Behavior in Proteins.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although most proteins conform to the classical one-structure/one-function paradigm, an increasing number of proteins with dual structures and functions have been discovered. In response to cellular stimuli, such proteins undergo structural changes sufficiently dramatic to remodel even their secondary structures and domain organization. This "fold-switching" capability fosters protein multi-functionality, enabling cells to establish tight control over various biochemical processes. Accurate predictions of fold-switching proteins could both suggest underlying mechanisms for uncharacterized biological processes and reveal potential drug targets. Recently, we developed a prediction method for fold-switching proteins using structure-based thermodynamic calculations and discrepancies between predicted and experimentally determined protein secondary structure (Porter and Looger, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018; 115:5968-5973). Here we seek to leverage the negative information found in these secondary structure prediction discrepancies. To do this, we quantified secondary structure prediction accuracies of 192 known fold-switching regions (FSRs) within solved protein structures found in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We find that the secondary structure prediction accuracies for these FSRs vary widely. Inaccurate secondary structure predictions are strongly associated with fold-switching proteins compared to equally long segments of non-fold-switching proteins selected at random. These inaccurate predictions are enriched in helix-to-strand and strand-to-coil discrepancies. Finally, we find that most proteins with inaccurate secondary structure predictions are underrepresented in the PDB compared with their alternatively folded cognates, suggesting that unequal representation of fold-switching conformers within the PDB could be an important cause of inaccurate secondary structure predictions. These results demonstrate that inconsistent secondary structure predictions can serve as a useful preliminary marker of fold switching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.