Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019
Immediate postoperative coronal imbalance in Lenke 5 and Lenke 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it predictable?
Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparable rates of lumbar disc degeneration at long-term following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal fusion extended to L3 or L4: systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine deformity · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Predictive Role of Shoulder Imbalance and Residual C7PL-CSVL in Coronal Imbalance After Surgery for Severe and Rigid Scoliosis: A Retrospective Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Selective lowest and upper instrumented vertebra for the correction of Lenke type 6C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of en-bloc direct vertebrae rotation and non-direct vertebrae rotation for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C: a retrospective study in Changsha, China.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Comparison between the lowest instrumented vertebrae L3 with the use of direct vertebrae rotation (DVR) and the lowest instrumented vertebrae L4 for non-DVR in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C/6C: when LEV is L4.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Long-Term Follow-up of Posterior Selective Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 10-Year Outcomes.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Transient fixation of L4 vertebra preserves lumbar motion and function in Lenke Type 5C and 6C scoliosis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImmediate postoperative coronal imbalance (IPCIB) is a common reason for worse postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and rarely improves on its own at follow-up, thereby greatly influencing the patients' health-related quality of life. However, no studies have been performed to detect the primary risk factors for IPCIB and it remains unclear whether the condition can be predicted preoperatively. The purpose of this study is to detect the primary risk factors for IPCIB in Lenke 5 and Lenke 6 AIS patients and to explore whether IPCIB can be predicted preoperatively.
methodsMedical records of Lenke 5 and Lenke 6 AIS patients who underwent correction surgery in our hospital from June 2017 to October 2018 were analyzed. Anteroposterior films were evaluated before and after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups, i.e., occurrence and non-occurrence of IPCIB. The risk factors for IPCIB were analyzed, and an IPCIB index was proposed and verified.
resultsThirty-seven Lenke 5/Lenke 6 AIS patients with IPCIB and 48 patients without IPCIB were recruited. Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two groups in the number of unfused vertebrae, preoperative thoracic Cobb angle, preoperative lumbar Cobb angle, preoperative translation of lumbar apex, preoperative coronal balance, preoperative L5 tilt, preoperative bending L5 tilt, postoperative translation of thoracic apex, postoperative lumbar Cobb angle, postoperative translation of lumbar apex, postoperative radiographic shoulder height, and postoperative L5 tilt. Logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative bending L5 tilt, postoperative translation of the thoracic apex, and postoperative lumbar Cobb angle were the primary risk factors for IPCIB. The IPCIB index was defined as 1.3 * preoperative bending L5 tilt + 1.5 * postoperative translation of thoracic apex - 0.8 * postoperative lumbar Cobb angle. The receiver operating characteristics curve indicated that the occurrence rate of IPCIB was 88% and the non-occurrence rate was 90% when the IPCIB index was greater than 16.
conclusionThe preoperative bending L5 tilt, postoperative translation of the thoracic apex, and the postoperative lumbar Cobb angle were the primary risk factors for IPCIB in Lenke 5 and Lenke 6 AIS patients. The IPCIB index can be used to predict the occurrence of IPCIB with high accuracy. Our results indicate that the thoracic curve should be adequately corrected during surgery; however, moderate correction of the lumbar curve is recommended. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.