SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2020
The Effect of Next-Generation TKI in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of First-Line Treatment: a Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resistance develops against first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), after a while for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, researchers have developed specific inhibitors against them. Among those inhibitors, next-generation EGFR-TKIs have gained prominence due to the greater efficacy and more favorable tolerability. Today, the efficacy of next-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC after failure on first-generation EGFR-TKIs still remains under investigation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically assess the efficacy and safety profiles of next-generation EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC after failure on first-generation EGFR-TKIs. We performed a comprehensive search of the several electronic databases to September, 2018 to identify clinical trials. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease controlled rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Severe adverse events (AEs) (grade ≥ 3) based on the EGFR-TKIs were analysed. Odds Ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were utilized for the main outcome analysis. In total, we had 3 randomized controlled trials in this analysis. The group of next-generation EGFR-TKIs was significantly improved PFS (OR = 0.34,95%CI = 0.29-0.40, P < 0.00001), as well with the ORR (OR = 10.48,95%CI = 3.87-28.34, P < 0.00001) and DCR (OR = 6.03,95%CI = 4.41-8.25, P < 0.00001), respectively. However, there is no significant difference in overall survival with next-generation EGFR-TKIs (OR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.85-1.31, P = 0.66). While, the OR for the treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 (diarrhoea, rash/acne, nausea, vomiting, anemia) between the patients who received next-generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy did not show safety benefit (P>0.05). Next-generation EGFR-TKIs was shown to be the better agent to achieve higher response rate and the longer PFS in NSCLC patients as the later-line therapy for previously treated patients with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. While, the benefit of the OS and safety compared with the chemotherapy did not achieved. Further research is needed to develop a database of all EGFR mutations and their individual impact on the differing treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31147837What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.