ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Surgical outcomes according to the type of monopolar electrocautery device used in laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a comparison of endo-hook versus endo-shears.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- External Lymphatic Fistula After Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Case Series.Cancers · 2025Article
- Risk factors of chylous ascites and its relationship with long-term prognosis in laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for right colon cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Clinical impact of inferior mesenteric vein preservation during left hemicolectomy with low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for distal transverse and descending colon cancers: A comparative study based on computed tomography.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Chylous ascites in colorectal surgery: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough monopolar electrocautery is preferred by many laparoscopic surgeons and is more cost-effective than bipolar or ultrasonic scissors, few studies have compared these outcomes between different monopolar electrocautery devices used in laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, this study compared the surgical outcomes between monopolar endo-hook versus endo-shears during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.
methodsUsing a prospective database of patients treated at our institute, we analyzed the surgical outcomes of 358 consecutive patients with right colon cancer who underwent curative laparoscopic surgery with a monopolar endo-hook (n = 164) or endo-shears (n = 194) between March 2009 and March 2017.
resultsThere were no differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists' grade, previous operative history, or clinical stage between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups. The estimated blood loss was similar between the endo-hook and endo-shears groups (90.9 ± 60.3 vs. 92.0 ± 89.3 mL; P = 0.893). The number of harvested lymph nodes was greater in the endo-hook group (53.5 ± 20.3 vs. 48.1 ± 18.5; P = 0.008). Hospital stay was shorter in the endo-hook group (6.8 ± 2.2 vs. 7.8 ± 4.8 days; P = 0.013). Although chylous ascites was more frequent in the endo-hook group (21.3% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), the postoperative morbidity rate was lower in this group (9.8% vs. 18.0%; P = 0.025). All instances of chylous ascites healed spontaneously without intervention.
conclusionsThis study showed that the use of a monopolar endo-hook during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy might permit more meticulous lymph-node dissection and reduce morbidity compared with the use of monopolar endo-shears. Therefore, we suggest that the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery might be associated with the type of electrocautery device used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.