ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020
Ambulant health care utilisation among children of childhood cancer survivors in Germany.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health outcomes in offspring born to survivors of childhood cancers following assisted reproductive technologies.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWithin the framework of a questionnaire-based health survey in Germany, we examined ambulant health care utilisation among childhood cancer survivors' offspring compared to utilisation among children of the general population.
methodsIn total, 1299 former patients received a questionnaire for every known biological child in two cross-sectional surveys, 2013/14 (n = 393) and 2015/16 (n = 906). For investigation of health care utilisation, questions on frequencies and kind of ambulant medical services were chosen for bivariate and multivariate analyses. Correlations between utilisation and anxiety, diagnosis of the parent, pain or preterm birth of the child and social indicators were conducted. For comparison with the general population, data of 17,640 children and adolescents aged 0 to 17 years were used for matched-pair analysis. These data were available from the KIGGS baseline study on the health of children and adolescents in Germany, conducted by the Robert Koch Institute.
resultsOverall, 852 (65.6%) of the contacted 1299 survivors completed 1340 questionnaires on their children's health. Childhood cancer survivors' offspring showed a similar attendance of ambulant primary health care compared to the general population (paediatricians 83.1% vs. 82.1%). However, the majority of specialist physicians was visited significantly more often (e.g. dermatologist 10.5% vs. 6.2%) by childhood cancer survivors' offspring compared to children from the general population. Logistic regression showed that parental diagnosis and anxiety on children's health significantly influenced health care utilisation.
conclusionsFurther improvement of after-care for childhood cancer survivors by including topics on offspring seems necessary. Offspring's paediatricians should implement counselling and providing of information considering the special family anamnesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.