Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147778›Full record

ArticleOecologia2019

Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.

S Vijayan, J K Lee, J Balaban-Feld, W A Mitchell, B P Kotler, M L Rosenzweig, T T Lotan, Z Abramsky

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

S VijayanDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel. vijayan@post.bgu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-3617
J K LeeDepartment of Life Sciences, Incheon National University, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, South Korea.
J Balaban-FeldDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
W A MitchellDepartment of Life Sciences, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN, 47809, USA.
B P KotlerDepartment of Desert Ecology, Ben-Gurion University, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
M L RosenzweigDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
T T LotanDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Z AbramskyDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILIncheon National University · KRIndiana State University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 05/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a heterogeneous environment containing multiple patches that may deplete and renew, a forager should be able to detect the quality of food resources within and among patches and choose to exploit them to best maximize returns. From the predator's perspective, the behavioral responses of the prey in a patch will be perceived as depletion when they retreat to refuge and renewal when they reemerge. A predator encountering responsive prey should manage predation risk, and thus behavioral resource depression, by optimally timing its return time to the patch based on prey behavior. We evaluated the foraging decisions of a predator that encountered patches differing in size of the refuge and prey density. We used little egrets and goldfish as predators and prey in an environment that contained three patches (pools). We manipulated prey density and refuge size and availability (using covers) and observed predator foraging behavior. When the egret had previously caught a fish it did not discriminate between the pools, and the return time was similar for all cover types. The fish densities also did not affect the egret decisions to return to pools. However, when it failed to catch fish, it returned sooner to the pool containing the small cover than the larger one. Additionally, after failing to catch fish in patches containing the highest prey density, the egrets subsequently preferred to return to such patches sooner. We show experimentally that previous failures influence the foraging decisions of a predator choosing how quickly to return to a previously visited patch.

Indexed as

BirdsPredatory BehaviorAnimalsFishesCoverForagingGoldfishLittle egretPatchPredationPreyReturn time

Identifiers

PMID31147778
OpenAlexW2947263933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.