Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147767›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2019

The impact of proximal femoral nail type on clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures: a comparative study.

Altuğ Duramaz, Mehmet Hakan İlter

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Barriers and facilitators of weight bearing after hip fracture surgery among older adults. A scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of the effect of proximal femur geometry on results of geriatric intertrochanteric fracture surgery.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Altuğ DuramazDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Tevfik Sağlam St. Number 11, Bakırköy, 34147, Istanbul, Turkey. altug.duramaz@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-2079
Mehmet Hakan İlterDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Tevfik Sağlam St. Number 11, Bakırköy, 34147, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the study was to compare three different proximal femoral nails in terms of functional and radiological outcomes in patients treated with closed reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFFs).

methodsBetween February 2010 and March 2016, 303 consecutive patients (132 male, 171 female) were included in the study. The groups were compared in terms of age, gender, body mass index, duration of surgery and duration of fluoroscopy, blood loss, type of fracture and quality of the reduction, complication rate, and functional and radiological results. Harris hip score (HHS), Barthel index, and full weight bearing time were used for functional evaluation. The quality of the reduction, collodiaphyseal angle (CDA), tip-apex distance (TAD), and fracture union were used for radiological results evaluation.

resultsThere was no significant difference between groups in terms of fracture type, reduction quality, and complication rates. The mean operation time, duration of scopy, blood loss, and TAD was higher for InterTan, whereas the mean postoperative CDA was higher for PFNA-II. Operation time, postoperative CDA, and full weight bearing duration were higher for Profin than for InterTan. The mean HHS and Barthel Index were higher for PFNA-II, while the mean duration of operation and fluoroscopy, blood loss, TAD, and full weight bearing time were higher for Profin.

conclusionPFNA-II is a better option than Profin and InterTAN in the treatment of IFFs when the surgical parameters and functional and radiological results were evaluated as a whole.

Indexed as

Bone NailsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleFluoroscopyFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpen Fracture ReductionOperative TimePostoperative PeriodClinical and radiological outcomesIntertrochanteric femur fracturesNail designProximal femoral nail

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.