Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147721›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Dietary Polar Lipids and Cognitive Development: A Narrative Review.

Lu Zheng, Mathilde Fleith, Francesca Giuffrida, Barry V O'Neill, Nora Schneider

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Amphiphilic Bioactives of Freshwater Aquatic PlantsPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lu ZhengNestec Ltd., Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mathilde FleithNestec Ltd., Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesca GiuffridaNestec Ltd., Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Barry V O'NeillNestec Ltd., Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nora SchneiderNestec Ltd., Nestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nestlé (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polar lipids are amphiphilic lipids with a hydrophilic head and a hydrophobic tail. Polar lipids mainly include phospholipids and sphingolipids. They are structural components of neural tissues, with the peak rate of accretion overlapping with neurodevelopmental milestones. The critical role of polar lipids in cognitive development is thought to be mediated through the regulation of signal transduction, myelination, and synaptic plasticity. Animal products (egg, meat, and dairy) are the major dietary sources of polar lipids for children and adults, whereas human milk and infant formula provide polar lipids to infants. Due to the differences observed in both concentration and proportion of polar lipids in human milk, the estimated daily intake in infants encompasses a wide range. In addition, health authorities define neither intake recommendations nor guidelines for polar lipid intake. However, adequate intake is defined for 2 nutrients that are elements of these polar lipids, namely choline and DHA. To date, limited studies exist on the brain bioavailability of dietary polar lipids via either placental transfer or the blood-brain barrier. Nevertheless, due to their role in pre- and postnatal development of the brain, there is a growing interest for the use of gangliosides, which are sphingolipids, as a dietary supplement for pregnant/lactating mothers or infants. In line with this, supplementing gangliosides and phospholipids in wild-type animals and healthy infants does suggest some positive effects on cognitive performance. Whether there is indeed added benefit of supplementing polar lipids in pregnant/lactating mothers or infants requires more clinical research. In this article, we report findings of a review of the state-of-the-art evidence on polar lipid supplementation and cognitive development. Dietary sources, recommended intake, and brain bioavailability of polar lipids are also discussed.

Indexed as

DietInfant FormulaMilk, HumanSurface-Active AgentsAnimalsBiological AvailabilityBrainCattleCognitionDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLipidsMaternal-Fetal ExchangeLipidsSurface-Active Agentscognitive developmentcomplex lipidsdietary intakefood sourceshuman milkinfant formulapolar lipids

Identifiers

PMID31147721
PMCPMC6855982
OpenAlexW2947856594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.