Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147625›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2019

Attitudes of blood donors to their sample and data donation for biobanking.

Vera Raivola, Karoliina Snell, Ilpo Helén, Jukka Partanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Health promotion for blood donors: A scoping review.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Equity in blood transfusion precision services.International journal for equity in health · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vera RaivolaFinnish Red Cross Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland.
Karoliina SnellHelsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2643-6676
Ilpo HelénDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka PartanenFinnish Red Cross Blood Service, Helsinki, Finland. jukka.partanen@veripalvelu.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern biomedical and genetic studies require large study cohorts; blood donors have been suggested to represent an appropriate group for recruiting healthy cohorts. The Blood Service Biobank (BSB) in Finland was recently established to recruit blood donors willing to give broad biobank consent. The aim of the present study is to understand how the blood bank context influences views on donating samples and health data. We organised 61 interviews and 10 group discussions with current and potential blood donors. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified three discussion frameworks that summarise the results. We found that frequent blood donors associated the voluntary act of donation with caring for patients. The blood donation experience was considered to accommodate biobank participation, but also allowed critical observations on the integration of research data collection into blood donation. Research participants identified an important difference between the blood bank and biobank contexts. In the biobank context, the focus shifts from donating blood to patients into donating personal and genetic data for research use. Blood donors' anxiety over data use was balanced with their experience of the trustworthiness of the Blood Service. These experiences indicated that the new biobanking activity could be trusted to a familiar organisation. To build donors' trust, biobanks should invest in their institutional reputation, donor experience and dialogue with donors. These findings can be applied to other institutions that are considering setting up biobanks with broad consent for personal data use.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeBehaviorBiological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchBlood DonorsFinlandHumansInformed ConsentPatient RightsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31147625
PMCPMC6871534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.