Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147490›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

The Development of an International Oncofertility Competency Framework: A Model to Increase Oncofertility Implementation.

Antoinette Anazodo, Paula Laws, Shanna Logan, Carla Saunders, Jo Travaglia, Brigitte Gerstl, Natalie Bradford, Richard Cohn, Mary Birdsall, Ronald Barr and 22 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating fertility preservation interventions for alignment with ASCO Guidelines for reproductive aged women undergoing cancer treatment: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Barriers to and Facilitators of Shared Decision-Making Implementation in Fertility Preservation for Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Developing a web-based oncofertility tool for reproductive-age women with breast cancer based on social support framework.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Antoinette AnazodoKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia antoinette.anazodo@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5495-6062
Paula LawsKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Shanna LoganSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Carla SaundersAustralian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Jo TravagliaAustralian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Brigitte GerstlKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Natalie BradfordInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
Richard CohnKids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Mary BirdsallFertility Associates, Auckland City, New Zealand.
Ronald BarrDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nao SuzukiSt. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Seido TakaeSt. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.
Ricardo MarinhoPro Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Shuo XiaoReproductive Health and Toxicology Lab, Department of Environmental Health Sciences Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Qiong-Hua ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Siming Qu, Xiamen Shi, People's Republic of China.
Nalini MahajanMother and Child Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Madhuri PatilDr. Patil's Fertility and Endoscopy Clinic, Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Endoscopic Surgery and Andrology, Bangalore, India.
Devika GunasheelaGunasheela Surgical and Maternity Hospital, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kristen SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Leonard SenderChildren's Hospital Orange County, Orange, California, USA.
Cláudia MeloCentro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Teresa Almeida-SantosCentro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Mahmoud SalamaReproductive Medicine Department, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Leslie AppiahThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Irene SuUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Sheila LaneChildren's Hospital Oxford Headley Way, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Teresa K WoodruffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Allan PaceyAcademic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Richard A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Francoise ShenfieldReproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth SullivanFaculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
William LedgerSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
University of Technology Sydney · AUHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTNorthwestern University · USSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPSydney Children's Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUBloom Fertility Centre · INChildren's Hospital of Orange County · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNInstituto Tropical de Medicina Reprodutiva · BRMcMaster University · CAMother Hospital · INMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBNational Water Research Center · EGPrince of Wales Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AURoyal Hospital for Women · AUThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Development of a High-Throughput Platform for Screening Ovotoxic Chemicals (K01ES030014)K01ES030014 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI XIAO, SHUO · 2019 to 2021
$490k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. Currently, oncofertility competencies do not exist. The aim of this study was to develop an oncofertility competency framework that defines the key components of oncofertility care, develops a model for prioritizing service development, and defines the roles that health care professionals (HCPs) play. MATERIALS AND

methodA quantitative modified Delphi methodology was used to conduct two rounds of an electronic survey, querying and synthesizing opinions about statements regarding oncofertility care with HCPs and patient and family advocacy groups (PFAs) from 16 countries (12 high and 4 middle income). Statements included the roles of HCPs and priorities for service development care across ten domains (communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, oncofertility training, reproductive survivorship care and fertility-related psychosocial support, supportive care, and ethical frameworks) that represent 33 different elements of care.

resultsThe first questionnaire was completed by 457 participants (332 HCPs and 125 PFAs). One hundred and thirty-eight participants completed the second questionnaire (122 HCPs and 16 PFAs). Consensus was agreed on 108 oncofertility competencies and the roles HCPs should play in oncofertility care. A three-tier service development model is proposed, with gradual implementation of different components of care. A total of 92.8% of the 108 agreed competencies also had agreement between high and middle income participants.

conclusionFP guidelines establish best practice but do not consider the skills and requirements to implement these guidelines. The competency framework gives HCPs and services a structure for the training of HCPs and implementation of care, as well as defining a model for prioritizing oncofertility service development. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite international evidence about fertility preservation (FP), several barriers still prevent the implementation of equitable FP practice. The competency framework gives 108 competencies that will allow health care professionals (HCPs) and services a structure for the development of oncofertility care, as well as define the role HCPs play to provide care and support. The framework also proposes a three-tier oncofertility service development model which prioritizes the development of components of oncofertility care into essential, enhanced, and expert services, giving clear recommendations for service development. The competency framework will enhance the implementation of FP guidelines, improving the equitable access to medical and psychological oncofertility care.

Indexed as

FemaleFertility PreservationHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCompetencyFertility preservationModels of careOncofertilityTraining

Identifiers

PMID31147490
PMCPMC6975957
OpenAlexW2947039620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.