ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Segregation through the multiscalar lens.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Life course trajectory segregation and political polarization in contemporary Sweden.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Racial Segregation, Transportation, and Unemployment Rates in the United States.Transport policy · 2026Article
- Urban segregation on multilayered transport networks: a random walk approach.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Quantifying ethnic segregation in cities through random walks.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Towards a new paradigm for segregation measurement in an age of big data.Urban informatics · 2022Review
- Diffusion segregation and the disproportionate incidence of COVID-19 in African American communities.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Reply to Stepinski and Dmowska: Segregation beyond scale and across space: Arbitrary versus objective analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Communicating racial segregation: Abstract versus concrete.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a mathematical framework that allows one to carry out multiscalar and multigroup spatial exploratory analysis across urban regions. By producing coefficients that integrate information across all scales and that are normalized with respect to theoretical maximally segregated configurations, this framework provides a practical and powerful tool for the comparative empirical analysis of urban segregation. We illustrate our method with a study of ethnic mixing in the Los Angeles metropolitan area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.