Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147366›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Mixed-methods feasibility study of blood pressure self-screening for hypertension detection.

Alice Tompson, Susannah Fleming, Mei-Man Lee, Mark Monahan, Sue Jowett, David McCartney, Sheila Greenfield, Carl Heneghan, Alison Ward, Richard Hobbs and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alice Tompson *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susannah Fleming *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-2051
Mei-Man LeeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark MonahanHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sue JowettHealth Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
David McCartneyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Service Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Carl HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1009-1992
Alison WardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3638-028X

Funding

Department of Health IS-SPC-0514-10043Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10051Medical Research Council MC_PC_11004Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of using a blood pressure (BP) self-measurement kiosk-a solid-cuff sphygmomanometer combined with technology to integrate the BP readings into patient electronic medical records- to improve hypertension detection.

designA concurrent mixed-methods feasibility study incorporating observational and qualitative interview components.

settingTwo English general practitioner (GP) surgeries.

participantsAdult patients registered at participating surgeries. Staff working at these sites.

interventionsBP self-measurement kiosks were placed in the waiting rooms for a 12-month period between 2015 and 2016 and compared with a 12-month control period prior to installation. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) The number of patients using the kiosk and agreeing to transfer of their data into their electronic medical records; (2) the cost of using a kiosk compared with GP/practice nurse BP screening; (3) qualitative themes regarding use of the equipment.

resultsOut of 15 624 eligible patients, only 186 (1.2%, 95% CI 1.0% to 1.4%) successfully used the kiosk to directly transfer a BP reading into their medical record. For a considerable portion of the intervention period, no readings were transferred, possibly indicating technical problems with the transfer link. A comparison of costs suggests that at least 52.6% of eligible patients would need to self-screen in order to bring costs below that of screening by GPs and practice nurses. Qualitative interviews confirmed that both patients and staff experienced technical difficulties, and used alternative methods to enter BP results into the medical record.

conclusionsWhile interviewees were generally positive about checking BP in the waiting room, the electronic transfer system as tested was neither robust, effective nor likely to be a cost-effective approach, thus may not be appropriate for a primary care environment. Since most of the cost of a kiosk system lies in the transfer mechanism, a solid-cuff sphygmomanometer and manual entry of results may be a suitable alternative.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCosts and Cost AnalysisEarly DiagnosisFacilities and Services UtilizationFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareUnited Kingdomblood pressurediagnostic self-evaluationhypertensionprimary healthcarescreening kiosks

Identifiers

PMID31147366
PMCPMC6549634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.