ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2019
Diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-derived fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity.
Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06726252 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Self-controlled Clinical Trial to Validate Optical Ultrasonic Flow Ratio), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicenter, Self-controlled Clinical Trial to Validate Optical Ultrasonic Flow Ratio (OUFR) Based on Intravascular Imaging
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Coronary Angiographic-Derived and Intracoronary Imaging-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Assessing Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of optical flow ratio: an individual patient-data meta-analysis.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic efficacy of the optical flow ratio in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Plaques Treated With a Bioresorbable Magnesium Scaffold: Insights From the BIOMAG-I Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Trial
- Use of Intracoronary Pressure Wire Assessment and Association With Outcomes: Insights From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society National Database.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Preclinical Serial Assessment of Virtual Physiology After Implantation of a Novel Endoluminal Resorbable Fibrillated Scaffold.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Intracoronary imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention: why, when, how and which from large, randomized trials.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Article
- From anatomy to vulnerability: A comprehensive appraisal of coronary physiology and plaque characterization.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology in the current era: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Prognostic impact of high-risk plaque morphology and impaired physiology in untreated non-culprit coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Computational Analysis of Intravascular OCT Images for Future Clinical Support: A Comprehensive Review.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Advances in Technology and Technique in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Clinical Review.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- When Functional Assessment Meets Intravascular Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Intravascular imaging for acute coronary syndrome.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Relationship and prognostic value of the triglyceride-glucose index and optical coherence tomography-derived physiological index in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for the analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography images: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Review
- OUFR Versus FFR for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients With Unstable Angina.JACC. Asia · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence based fractional flow reserve.Cardiology journal · 2025Review
- Segmental post-percutaneous coronary intervention physiological gradients using ultrasonic or optical flow ratio: insights from ASET JAPAN study.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsA novel method for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was developed recently. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new OCT-based FFR (OFR) computational approach, using wire-based FFR as the reference standard. METHODS AND
resultsPatients who underwent both OCT and FFR prior to intervention were analysed. The lumen of the interrogated vessel and the ostia of the side branches were automatically delineated and used to compute OFR. Bifurcation fractal laws were applied to correct the change in reference lumen size due to the step-down phenomenon. OFR was compared with FFR, both using a cut-off value of 0.80 to define ischaemia. Computational analysis was performed in 125 vessels from 118 patients. Average FFR was 0.80±0.09. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for OFR to identify FFR ≤0.80 was 90% (95% CI: 84-95), 87% (95% CI: 77-94), 92% (95% CI: 82-97), 92% (95% CI: 82-97), and 88% (95% CI: 77-95), respectively. The AUC was higher for OFR than minimal lumen area (0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-0.97] versus 0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86], p=0.002). Average OFR analysis time was 55±23 seconds for each OCT pullback. Intra- and inter-observer variability in OFR analysis was 0.00±0.02 and 0.00±0.03, respectively.
conclusionsOFR is a novel and fast method allowing assessment of flow-limiting coronary stenosis without pressure wire and induced hyperaemia. The good diagnostic accuracy and low observer variability bear the potential of improved integration of intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.