Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147169›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2019

Invasive mediastinal staging for resected non-small cell lung cancer in a population-based cohort.

Raymond U Osarogiagbon, Yu-Sheng Lee, Nicholas R Faris, Meredith A Ray, Philip O Ojeabulu, Matthew P Smeltzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Survival After Mediastinal Node Dissection, Systematic Sampling, or Neither for Early Stage NSCLC.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Surgeon Quality and Patient Survival After Resection for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mediastinal staging for non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mediastinal staging: when and how?General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raymond U OsarogiagbonMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tenn. Electronic address: rosarogi@bmhcc.org.
Yu-Sheng LeeDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, Tenn.
Nicholas R FarisMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tenn.
Meredith A RayDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, Tenn.
Philip O OjeabuluMultidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tenn.
Matthew P SmeltzerDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, Tenn.
University of Memphis · US

Funding

Improving pathologic nodal staging of resected lung cancerR01CA172253 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OSAROGIAGBON, RAYMOND U · 2013 to 2022
$4.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInvasive mediastinal nodal staging is recommended before curative-intent resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer deemed at risk for mediastinal lymph node involvement. We evaluated the use and survival effect of preoperative invasive mediastinal nodal staging in a population-based non-small cell lung cancer cohort.

methodsWe analyzed all curative-intent resections for non-small cell lung cancer from 2009 to 2018 in 11 hospitals in 4 contiguous Dartmouth Hospital Referral Regions, comparing patients who did not have invasive mediastinal nodal staging with those who did.

resultsPreoperative invasive nodal staging was used in 22% of 2916 patients, including mediastinoscopy only in 13%, minimally invasive procedures only in 6%, and both approaches in 3%. Sixty-three percent of patients at risk for nodal disease (tumor size ≥3.0 cm/T2-T4; N1-N3 by computed tomography or positron-emission tomography-computerized tomography criterion) did not undergo invasive staging; among those who did not have invasive testing, 47% had at least 1 of the 3 clinical indications. Mediastinoscopy yielded a median of 3 lymph nodes and 2 nodal stations; 17% of mediastinoscopies and 31% of endobronchial ultrasound procedures yielded no lymph node material. Patients not invasively staged were more likely to have no nodes (6% vs 2%; P < .0001) and no mediastinal nodes (20% vs 11%; P < .0001) examined at surgery. Invasive staging was associated with significantly better survival (P = .0157).

conclusionsMore than a decade after the 2001 American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation report, preoperative invasive nodal staging remains underused and of variable quality, but was associated with survival benefit in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationMediastinoscopyAgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPneumonectomyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultsclinical stagingpreoperative evaluationquality of caresurgical resectionsurvival impact

Identifiers

PMID31147169
PMCPMC6754300
OpenAlexW2943313596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.