Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31147151›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2019

Object Vision in a Structured World.

Daniel Kaiser, Genevieve L Quek, Radoslaw M Cichy, Marius V Peelen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Joint Attention Grouping Effect: Perceptual Binding of Observed Social Interactions.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Processing Stages for Social Interaction Recognition.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Characterizing internal models of the visual environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Beyond binding: from modular to natural vision.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel KaiserDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: danielkaiser.net@gmail.com.
Genevieve L QuekDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radoslaw M CichyDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marius V PeelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.peelen@donders.ru.nl.

Funding

European Research Council 725970European Research Council 803370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In natural vision, objects appear at typical locations, both with respect to visual space (e.g., an airplane in the upper part of a scene) and other objects (e.g., a lamp above a table). Recent studies have shown that object vision is strongly adapted to such positional regularities. In this review we synthesize these developments, highlighting that adaptations to positional regularities facilitate object detection and recognition, and sharpen the representations of objects in visual cortex. These effects are pervasive across various types of high-level content. We posit that adaptations to real-world structure collectively support optimal usage of limited cortical processing resources. Taking positional regularities into account will thus be essential for understanding efficient object vision in the real world.

Indexed as

BrainHumansVisual Perceptionhigh-level visionobject perceptionpositional regularitiesreal-world structure

Identifiers

PMID31147151
PMCPMC7612023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.