Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146766›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2019

A content validity and cognitive interview process to evaluate an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

Olayinka O Shiyanbola, Daniel Bolt, Adati Tarfa, Carolyn Brown, Earlise Ward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olayinka O ShiyanbolaDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. Olayinka.Shiyanbola@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6018-2104
Daniel BoltDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Adati TarfaDivision of Social and Administrative Sciences School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 777 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Carolyn BrownDivision of Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Earlise WardDepartment of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002374 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bo Liu, Marin Leigh Schweizer · 2017 to 2026
$9.7M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison 5KL2TR000428Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison UL1TR000427NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002374NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) is the only available and empirically validated tool used to gain insight into patient illness beliefs. However, the IPQ has reliability and validity problems when used with African Americans (AAs) and needs to be culturally-adapted and validated for use with this group. This study aimed to utilize findings from focus groups to culturally adapt the IPQ for use in AAs with diabetes. Ten cognitive interviews among AAs with type 2 diabetes explored patients' interpretation and understanding of the adapted IPQ.

resultsForty-four new survey items were added to the IPQ. Twenty-nine of the forty-four items were determined as the appropriate number of questions to be tested because of time, and to reduce respondent burden. After the first round of interviews, an item-by-item review of the new items identified problems related to AA comprehension of certain items, their applicability, and wording/tone. Five items identified as problematic were related to AAs understanding of a cure for diabetes, their perception of how food influences their diabetes, how their identity as AAs influence diabetes control, and the dialogue about diabetes within their families and/or community. Findings support the newly developed illness perception questions as culturally specific to AAs with diabetes after being tested for content validity and participant understanding using cognitive interviews.

Indexed as

CognitionSurveys and QuestionnairesBlack or African AmericanDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesAfrican AmericansCognitive interviewsDiabetesIllness perception

Identifiers

PMID31146766
PMCPMC6543586
OpenAlexW2947034572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.