Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146759›Full record

SynthesisReproductive health2019

Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.

Gill Thomson, Claire Feeley, Victoria Hall Moran, Soo Downe, Olufemi T Oladapo

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06678893 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pilor Trial of Auricular Acupuncture for Latent Labor-Related Pain and Anxiety

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomen and Infants Hospital of Rhode IslandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsPain, Anxiety, LaborArmsAcupuncture Needle on an adhesive, Adhesives
NCT07031635 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Hydrotherapy During Labor on Labor Pain, Duration of Labor, Birth Affectivity, and Breastfeeding

TypeinterventionalSponsorSelcuk UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsPregnancy, Latent PhaseArmsHydrotherapy (Warm Shower)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gill ThomsonSchool of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK. GThomson@uclan.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3392-8182
Claire FeeleySchool of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.
Victoria Hall MoranSchool of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.
Soo DowneSchool of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.
Olufemi T OladapoDevelopment and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Lancashire · GBWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany women use pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain relief during childbirth. Evidence from Cochrane reviews shows that effective pain relief is not always associated with high maternal satisfaction scores. However, understanding women's views is important for good quality maternity care provision. We undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis of women's views and experiences of pharmacological (epidural, opioid analgesia) and non-pharmacological (relaxation, massage techniques) pain relief options, to understand what affects women's decisions and choices and to inform guidelines, policy, and practice.

methodsWe searched seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, EMBASE, Global Index Medicus, AJOL), tracked citations and checked references. We used thematic and meta-ethnographic techniques for analysis purposes, and GRADE-CERQual tool to assess confidence in review findings. We developed review findings for each method. We then re-analysed the review findings thematically to highlight similarities and differences in women's accounts of different pain relief methods.

resultsFrom 11,782 hits, we screened full 58 papers. Twenty-four studies provided findings for the synthesis: epidural (n = 12), opioids (n = 3), relaxation (n = 8) and massage (n = 4) - all conducted in upper-middle and high-income countries (HMICs). Re-analysis of the review findings produced five key themes. 'Desires for pain relief' illuminates different reasons for using pharmacological or non-pharmacological pain relief. 'Impact on pain' describes varying levels of effectiveness of the methods used. 'Influence and experience of support' highlights women's positive or negative experiences of support from professionals and/or birth companions. 'Influence on focus and capabilities' illustrates that all pain relief methods can facilitate maternal control, but some found non-pharmacological techniques less effective than anticipated, and others reported complications associated with medication use. Finally, 'impact on wellbeing and health' reports that whilst some women were satisfied with their pain relief method, medication was associated with negative self-reprisals, whereas women taught relaxation techniques often continued to use these methods with beneficial outcomes.

conclusionWomen report mixed experiences of different pain relief methods. Pharmacological methods can reduce pain but have negative side-effects. Non-pharmacological methods may not reduce labour pain but can facilitate bonding with professionals and birth supporters. Women need information on risks and benefits of all available pain relief methods.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementParturitionAnalgesicsFemaleHumansLabor, ObstetricLabor PainPatient SatisfactionPregnancyAnalgesicsCERQualChildbirthEpiduralLabourMassageOpiatesOpioidsPain reliefQualitativeRelaxation

Identifiers

PMID31146759
PMCPMC6543627
OpenAlexW2947892372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.