Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146704›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis discloses chromosome copy number alterations as indicators of patient outcome in lymph node-negative breast cancer.

Ryoko Kikuchi-Koike, Kazunori Nagasaka, Hitoshi Tsuda, Yasuyuki Ishii, Masaru Sakamoto, Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Shiho Fukui, Yuko Miyagawa, Haruko Hiraike, Takayuki Kobayashi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ryoko Kikuchi-KoikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunori NagasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. nagasakak-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0696-5175
Hitoshi TsudaDepartment of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuyuki IshiiResearch & Development Management Headquarters, Pharmaceutical & Healthcare Research Laboratories, FUJIFILM Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masaru SakamotoDivision of Molecular Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgical Research, Sasaki Institute, Sasaki Foundation, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KikuchiDepartment of Gynecology, Ohki Memorial Kikuchi Cancer Clinic for Women, Saitama, Japan.
Shiho FukuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko MiyagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruko HiraikeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayuki KobayashiDepartment of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Takayuki KinoshitaDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yae KanaiDivision of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuhiro ShibataDivision of Cancer Genomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Issei ImotoDepartment of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Johji InazawaDepartment of Molecular Cytogenetics, Medical Research Institute and Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu MatsubaraDepartment of Basic Pathology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Takuya AyabeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Teikyo University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPFujifilm (Japan) · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPSasaki Institute · JPTokushima University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with lymph node metastasis-negative (pN0) invasive breast cancer have favorable outcomes following initial treatment. However, false negatives which occur during routine histologic examination of lymph nodes are reported to underestimate the clinical stage of disease. To identify a high-risk group in pN0 invasive breast cancer, we examined copy number alterations (CNAs) of 800 cancer-related genes.

methodsUsing array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in 51 pN0 cases (19 relapsed and 32 non-relapsed cases), the positivities of specific gene CNAs in the relapsed and non-relapsed groups were compared. An unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was then performed to identify case groups that were correlated with patient outcomes.

resultsThe cluster analysis identified three distinct clusters of cases: groups 1, 2, and 3. The major component was triple-negative cases (69%, 9 of 13) in group 1, luminal B-like (57%, 13 of 23) and HER2-overexpressing (26%, 6 of 23) subtypes in group 2, and luminal A-like subtype (60%, 9 of 15) in group 3. Among all 51 cases, those in group 1 showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) than group 2 (p = 0.014), and 5q15 loss was correlated with worse OS (p = 0.017). Among 19 relapsed cases, both OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.0083 and 0.0018, respectively), and 5q15 loss, 12p13.31 gain, and absence of 16p13.3 gain were significantly correlated with worse OS and RFS (p = 0.019 and 0.0027, respectively).

conclusionsAs the target genes in these loci, NR2F1 (5q15), TNFRSF1A (12p13.31), and ABCA3 (16p13.3) were examined. 5q15 loss, 12p13.31 gain, and absence of 16q13.3 gain were potential indicators of high-risk recurrence and aggressive clinical behavior of pN0 invasive breast cancers.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsCluster AnalysisComparative Genomic HybridizationDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedSurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorABCA3Array-CGHNR2F1pN0 invasive breast cancerTNFRSF1A

Identifiers

PMID31146704
PMCPMC6543587
OpenAlexW2947285036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.