Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146682›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

Models with indirect genetic effects depending on group sizes: a simulation study assessing the precision of the estimates of the dilution parameter.

Marzieh Heidaritabar, Piter Bijma, Luc Janss, Chiara Bortoluzzi, Hanne M Nielsen, Per Madsen, Birgitte Ask, Ole F Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marzieh HeidaritabarDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark. marzieh_heidaritabar@yahoo.com.
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Luc JanssDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Chiara BortoluzziAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Hanne M NielsenSEGES, Danish Pig Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per MadsenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Birgitte AskSEGES, Danish Pig Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole F ChristensenDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKDanish Agriculture and Food Council · DKWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries 34009-14-0849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn settings with social interactions, the phenotype of an individual is affected by the direct genetic effect (DGE) of the individual itself and by indirect genetic effects (IGE) of its group mates. In the presence of IGE, heritable variance and response to selection depend on size of the interaction group (group size), which can be modelled via a 'dilution' parameter (d) that measures the magnitude of IGE as a function of group size. However, little is known about the estimability of d and the precision of its estimate. Our aim was to investigate how precisely d can be estimated and what determines this precision.

methodsWe simulated data with different group sizes and estimated d using a mixed model that included IGE and d. Schemes included various average group sizes (4, 6, and 8), variation in group size (coefficient of variation (CV) ranging from 0.125 to 1.010), and three values of d (0, 0.5, and 1). A design in which individuals were randomly allocated to groups was used for all schemes and a design with two families per group was used for some schemes. Parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Bias and precision of estimates were used to assess their statistical quality.

resultsThe dilution parameter of IGE can be estimated for simulated data with variation in group size. For all schemes, the length of confidence intervals ranged from 0.114 to 0.927 for d, from 0.149 to 0.198 for variance of DGE, from 0.011 to 0.086 for variance of IGE, and from 0.310 to 0.557 for genetic correlation between DGE and IGE. To estimate d, schemes with groups composed of two families performed slightly better than schemes with randomly composed groups.

conclusionsDilution of IGE was estimable, and in general its estimation was more precise when CV of group size was larger. All estimated parameters were unbiased. Estimation of dilution of IGE allows the contribution of direct and indirect variance components to heritable variance to be quantified in relation to group size and, thus, it could improve prediction of the expected response to selection in environments with group sizes that differ from the average size.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, GeneticAnimalsFemaleLivestockMalePhenotypeSample SizeSelection, GeneticSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31146682
PMCPMC6543592
OpenAlexW2947112526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.