Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146472›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2019

Porous Alginate Scaffolds Assembled Using Vaterite CaCO

Alena Sergeeva, Anna S Vikulina, Dmitry Volodkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cryptic cycling by electroactive bacterioplankton in Trout Bog Lake.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hard, Soft, and Hard-Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Review
  18. Alginate: Enhancement Strategies for Advanced Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alena SergeevaFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses, Am Mühlenberg 13, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany. alenasergeeva@mail.ru.
Anna S VikulinaFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Branch Bioanalytics and Bioprocesses, Am Mühlenberg 13, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany. anna.vikulina@izi-bb.fraunhofer.de.
Dmitry VolodkinSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane,Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK. dmitry.volodkin@ntu.ac.uk.

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Sofja Kovalevskaja ProgramDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst German Academic Exchange Service, Mikhail Lomonosov programNottingham Trent University QR Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formulation of multifunctional biopolymer-based scaffolds is one of the major focuses in modern tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Besides proper mechanical/chemical properties, an ideal scaffold should: (i) possess a well-tuned porous internal structure for cell seeding/growth and (ii) host bioactive molecules to be protected against biodegradation and presented to cells when required. Alginate hydrogels were extensively developed to serve as scaffolds, and recent advances in the hydrogel formulation demonstrate their applicability as "ideal" soft scaffolds. This review focuses on advanced porous alginate scaffolds (PAS) fabricated using hard templating on vaterite CaCO

Indexed as

calcium alginatecalcium carbonatecell culturedrug deliveryencapsulationpolymer scaffoldporous hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID31146472
PMCPMC6630714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.