Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146420›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Second-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel for Patients with Unresectable Advanced Pancreatic Cancer after First-Line FOLFIRINOX Failure.

Naoki Mita, Takuji Iwashita, Shinya Uemura, Kensaku Yoshida, Yuhei Iwasa, Nobuhiro Ando, Keisuke Iwata, Mitsuru Okuno, Tsuyoshi Mukai, Masahito Shimizu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki MitaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. mitanao8@yahoo.co.jp.
Takuji IwashitaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. takuji@w7.dion.ne.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4978-1787
Shinya UemuraFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. ueshin550621@gmail.com.
Kensaku YoshidaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. kensakuyoshidaky@gmail.com.
Yuhei IwasaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. festinalenteyu@gmail.com.
Nobuhiro AndoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu 500-8717, Japan. nobuhiro5091ando@yahoo.co.jp.
Keisuke IwataDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu 500-8717, Japan. keisukeiwata@nifty.com.
Mitsuru OkunoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu 500-8513, Japan. mkobdkl@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8989-6437
Tsuyoshi MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu 500-8513, Japan. tsuyomukai@yahoo.co.jp.
Masahito ShimizuFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan. shimim-gif@umin.ac.jp.
Gifu University Hospital · JPGifu Municipal Hospital · JPGifu Prefectural General Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FOLFIRINOX (FX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been reported as effective regimens for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). FX may be more effective but is also associated with more adverse events (AEs). Therefore, first-line treatment with FX followed by second-line GnP may be appropriate.

aimsTo assess the safety and efficacy of second-line GnP for patients with APC after first-line FX failure.

methodsThis study was a multicenter prospective phase II study evaluating second-line GnP in patients with APC after failed first-line FX. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the frequency and degree of adverse events (AEs).

resultsThirty patients (14 male; median age, 64 years) were enrolled. The RR was 13.3%, with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months. The median OS and PFS were 7.6 and 3.8 months, respectively. From the beginning of first-line treatment, the median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 70% of patients.

conclusionSecond-line GnP after FX failure for patients with APC could be more effective than GEM alone. Further comparison studies are warranted.

Indexed as

FORFILINOXgemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxelpancreatic cancersecond-line chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31146420
PMCPMC6616879
OpenAlexW2946882971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.