Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146365›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Pseudo-Random Encryption for Security Data Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks.

Liang Liu, Wen Chen, Tao Li, Yuling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liang LiuCollege of Cybersecurity, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. liangzhai118@163.com.
Wen ChenCollege of Cybersecurity, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. wenchen@scu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0566-2495
Tao LiCollege of Cybersecurity, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. litao@scu.edu.cn.
Yuling LiuCollege of Cybersecurity, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China. xiaye524@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFB0800605 and 2016YFB0800604Natural Science Foundation of China 61872255, U1736212 299 and 61572334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The security of wireless sensor networks (WSN) has become a great challenge due to the transmission of sensor data through an open and wireless network with limited resources. In the paper, we discussed a lightweight security scheme to protect the confidentiality of data transmission between sensors and an ally fusion center (AFC) over insecure links. For the typical security problem of WSN's binary hypothesis testing of a target's state, sensors were divided into flipping and non-flipping groups according to the outputs of a pseudo-random function which was held by sensors and the AFC. Then in order to prevent an enemy fusion center (EFC) from eavesdropping, the binary outputs from the flipping group were intentionally flipped to hinder the EFC's data fusion. Accordingly, the AFC performed inverse flipping to recover the flipped data before data fusion. We extended the scheme to a more common scenario with multiple scales of sensor quantification and candidate states. The underlying idea was that the sensor measurements were randomly mapped to other quantification scales using a mapping matrix, which ensured that as long as the EFC was not aware of the matrix, it could not distract any useful information from the captured data, while the AFC could appropriately perform data fusion based on the inverse mapping of the sensor outputs.

Indexed as

distributed detectionlikelihood ratio testnetwork securitypseudo-random functionwireless sensor network

Identifiers

PMID31146365
PMCPMC6603733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.