ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Assessment of imaging Cherenkov and scintillation signals in head and neck radiotherapy.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid Monte Carlo model for efficient tissue Cherenkov emission estimation to assess changes from beam size, energy and incidence.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025Article
- Innovative approaches in precision radiation oncology: advanced imaging technologies and challenges which shape the future of radiation therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Review of Cherenkov imaging technology advances in radiotherapy: single-photon-level imaging in high ambient light and radiation backgrounds.Biophotonics discovery · 2024Review
- Characterization of Cherenkov imaging parameters and positional constraints on an O-ring linear accelerator.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Computational dose visualization & comparison in total skin electron treatment suggests superior coverage by the rotational versus the Stanford technique.Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences · 2022Article
- Optimization of in vivo Cherenkov imaging dosimetry via spectral choices for ambient background lights and filtering.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
- Detective quantum efficiency of intensified CMOS cameras for Cherenkov imaging in radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Scintillation imaging as a high-resolution, remote, versatile 2D detection system for MR-linac quality assurance.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Technical Note: A novel dosimeter improves total skin electron therapy surface dosimetry workflow.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Tracking tumor radiotherapy response in vivo with Cherenkov-excited luminescence ink imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Imaging luminescent tattoo inks for direct visualization of linac and cobalt irradiation.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Experimentally Observed Cherenkov Light Generation in the Eye During Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020Article
- Cherenkov imaging for total skin electron therapy (TSET).Medical physics · 2020Article
- Improvements to an optical scintillator imaging-based tissue dosimetry system.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- One Year of Clinic-Wide Cherenkov Imaging for Discovery of Quality Improvement Opportunities in Radiation Therapy.Practical radiation oncologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to test the utility of time-gated optical imaging of head and neck (HN) radiotherapy treatments to measure surface dosimetry in real-time and inform possible interfraction replanning decisions. The benefit of both Cherenkov and scintillator imaging in HN treatments is direct daily feedback on dose, with no change to the clinical workflow. Emission from treatment materials was characterized by measuring radioluminescence spectra during irradiation and comparing emission intensities relative to Cherenkov emission produced in phantoms and scintillation from small plastic targets. HN treatment plans were delivered to a phantom with bolus and mask present to measure impact on signal quality. Interfraction superficial tumor reduction was simulated on a HN phantom, and cumulative Cherenkov images were analyzed in the region of interest (ROI). HN human patient treatment was imaged through the mask and compared with the dose distribution calculated by the treatment planning system. The relative intensity of radioluminescence from the mask was found to be within 30% of the Cherenkov emission intensity from tissue-colored clay. A strong linear relationship between normalized cumulative Cherenkov intensity and tumor size was established ([Formula: see text]). The presence of a mask above a scintillator ROI was found to decrease mean pixel intensity by >40% and increase distribution spread. Cherenkov imaging through mask material is shown to have potential for surface field verification and tracking of superficial anatomy changes between treatment fractions. Imaging of scintillating targets provides a direct imaging of surface dose on the patient and through transparent bolus material. The first imaging of a patient receiving HN radiotherapy was achieved with a signal map which qualitatively matches the surface dose plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.