ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019
Response to the letter concerning the publication: Amyloid pathology fingerprint differentiates post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury. Mohamed AZ, et al. NeuroImage Clinical 2018 June 5;19:716-726.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From imaging to intervention: emerging potential of PET biomarkers to shape therapeutic strategies for TBI-induced neurodegeneration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In August 2018, Weiner and colleagues raised a red flag concerning certain errors in the tables and figures of our article, "Amyloid pathology fingerprint differentiates post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage Clinical 2018 Jun 5;19:716-726". We have addressed this in detail in our published "Corrigendum to 'Amyloid pathology fingerprint differentiates post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury' NeuroImage: Clinical. 19 (2018) 716-726". However, recently Prof. Weiner and colleagues have raised a new issue in indicating that they could not 'replicate our results, despite accurately emulating our methods. We have prepared this letter in response to their recent letter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.