Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31146116›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

The effects of lesion and treatment-related recovery on functional network modularity in post-stroke dysgraphia.

Yuan Tao, Brenda Rapp

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927302 (The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01927302 nacompletednot on this map

The Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery (CNLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2013 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsAphasia, Dysgraphia, Anomia, AgrammatismArmsTreatment Focusing on Naming Objects, Treatment Focusing on Improving Spelling Abilities, Treatment Focusing on Improving Sentence Processing, No Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of spatial processing in verbal serial order working memory.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neuroplasticity in Aphasia: A Proposed Framework of Language Recovery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuan TaoDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA. Electronic address: yuan.tao@jhu.edu.
Brenda RappDepartment of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Language Recovery in Aphasia: Natural History and Treatment-Ind*P50DC012283 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI THOMPSON, CYNTHIA K · 2013 to 2017
$11.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC012283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A better understanding of the neural network properties that support cognitive recovery after a brain lesion is important for our understanding of human neuroplasticity and may have valuable clinical implications. In fifteen individuals with chronic, acquired written language deficits subsequent to left-hemisphere stroke, we used task-based functional connectivity to evaluate the relationship between the graph-theoretic measures (modularity, participation coefficient and within-module degree z-score) and written language production accuracy before and after behavioral treatment. A reference modular structure and local and global hubs identified from healthy controls formed the basis of the analyses. Overall, the investigation revealed that less modular networks with greater global and lower local integration were associated with greater deficit severity and lower response to treatment. Furthermore, we found treatment-induced increases in modularity and local integration measures. In particular, local integration within intact ventral occipital-temporal regions of the spelling network showed the greatest increase in local integration following treatment. This investigation significantly extends previous research by using task-based (rather than resting-state) functional connectivity to examine a larger set of network characteristics in the evaluation of treatment-induced recovery and by including comparisons with control participants. The findings demonstrate the relevance of network modularity for understanding the neuroplasticity supporting functional neural reorganization.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAgedAgraphiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationCognitive recoveryDysgraphiaGraph-theoretic measuresModularityNetwork propertyNeuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID31146116
PMCPMC6538967
OpenAlexW2946268031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.