Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145947›Full record

ArticleUrology2019

Overuse of Cystoscopic Surveillance Among Patients With Low-risk Non-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer - A National Study of Patient, Provider, and Facility Factors.

David S Han, Kristine E Lynch, Ji Won Chang, Brenda Sirovich, Douglas J Robertson, Amanda R Swanton, John D Seigne, Philip P Goodney, Florian R Schroeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Alternating Cystoscopy with Bladder EpiCheckBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

David S HanThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH.
Kristine E LynchVA Salt Lake City Health Care System and the Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Ji Won ChangVA Salt Lake City Health Care System and the Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Brenda SirovichThe White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.
Douglas J RobertsonThe White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.
Amanda R SwantonSection of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
John D SeigneSection of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Philip P GoodneyThe White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT.
Florian R SchroeckThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; The White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT; Section of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH. Electronic address: florian.r.schroeck@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

Alignment of Treatment Preferences and Repair Type for Veterans with AAAI01HX001880 · VA · WHITE RIVER JUNCTION VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOODNEY, PHILIP P · 2018 to 2020
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand cystoscopic surveillance practices among patients with low-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

methodsUsing a validated natural language processing algorithm, we included patients newly diagnosed with low-risk (ie low-grade Ta) NMIBC from 2005 to 2011 in the VA. Patients were followed until cancer recurrence, death, last contact, or 2 years after diagnosis. Based on guidelines, surveillance overuse was defined as >1 cystoscopy if followed <1 year, >2 cystoscopies if followed 1 to <2 years, or >3 cystoscopies if followed for 2 years. We identified patient, provider, and facility factors associated with overuse using multilevel logistic regression.

resultsOveruse occurred in 75% of patients (852/1135) - with an excess of 1846 more cystoscopies performed than recommended. Adjusting for 14 factors, overuse was associated with patient race (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.85 unlisted race vs White), having 2 comorbidities (OR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.00, 2.55 vs no comorbidities), and earlier year of diagnosis (OR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.29, 4.83 for 2005 vs 2011, and OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.69 for 2006 vs 2011). On sensitivity analyses assuming all patients were diagnosed with multifocal or large low-grade tumors (ie, intermediate-risk), overuse would have still occurred in 45% of patients.

conclusionOveruse of cystoscopy among patients with low-risk NMIBC was common, raising concerns about bladder cancer surveillance cost and quality. However, few factors were associated with overuse. Further qualitative research is needed to identify other determinants of overuse not readily captured in administrative data.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesCystoscopyFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm InvasivenessProcedures and Techniques UtilizationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsWatchful Waiting

Identifiers

PMID31145947
PMCPMC6711796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.