Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Family physicians' views on participating in prevention of major depression. The predictD-EVAL qualitative study.

Patricia Moreno-Peral, Sonia Conejo-Cerón, Anna Fernández, Carlos Martín-Pérez, Carmen Fernández-Alonso, Antonina Rodríguez-Bayón, María Isabel Ballesta-Rodríguez, José María Aiarzagüena, Carmen Montón-Franco, Michael King and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Use of a personalised depression intervention in primary care to prevent anxiety: a secondary study of a cluster randomised trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Trial
  3. Role of primary care in depression relapse: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia Moreno-PeralInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-9090
Sonia Conejo-CerónInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
Anna FernándezParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Martín-PérezCentro de Salud Marquesado, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Granada, Spain.
Carmen Fernández-AlonsoService Assistance Programs, Regional Health Management Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Antonina Rodríguez-BayónCentro de Salud San José, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Linares, Jaén, Spain.
María Isabel Ballesta-RodríguezCentro de Salud Federico del Castillo, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Jaén, Spain.
José María AiarzagüenaCentro de Salud San Ignacio, Primary Care Research Unit, Osakidetza, Bilbao, Spain.
Carmen Montón-FrancoCentro de Salud Casablanca, Zaragoza, Spain.
Michael KingDivision of Psychiatry (Faculty of Brain Sciences), University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Irwin NazarethDepartment of Primary care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Juan Ángel BellónInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.
Andalusian Health Service · ESRed de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud · ESMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBOsakidetza · ESParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe predictD intervention, a multicomponent intervention delivered by family physicians (FPs), reduced the incidence of major depression by 21% versus the control group and was cost-effective. A qualitative methodology was proposed to identify the mechanisms of action of these complex interventions. PURPOSE: To seek the opinions of these FPs on the potential successful components of the predictD intervention for the primary prevention of depression in primary care and to identify areas for improvement.

methodQualitative study with FPs who delivered the predictD intervention at 35 urban primary care centres in seven Spanish cities. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews adopting a phenomenological approach. The data was triangulated by three investigators using thematic analysis and respondent validation was carried out.

resultsSixty-seven FPs were interviewed and they indicated strategies used to perform the predictD intervention, including specific communication skills such as empathy and the activation of patient resources. They perceived barriers such as lack of time and facilitators such as prior acquaintance with patients. FPs recognized the positive consequences of the intervention for FPs, patients and the doctor-patient relationship. They also identified strategies for future versions and implementations of the predictD intervention.

conclusionsThe FPs who carried out the predictD intervention identified factors potentially associated with successful prevention using this program and others that could be improved. Their opinions about the predictD intervention will enable development of a more effective and acceptable version and its implementation in different primary health care settings.

Indexed as

EmotionsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAttitudeFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareSpain

Identifiers

PMID31145762
PMCPMC6542521
OpenAlexW2946961550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.