Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145735›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A qualitative analysis to identify the elements that support department level change in the life sciences: The PULSE Vision & Change Recognition Program.

Marcy Peteroy-Kelly, Loretta Brancaccio-Taras, Judy Awong-Taylor, Teresa Balser, Thomas Jack, Sara Lindsay, Kate Marley, Sandra Romano, J Akif Uzman, Pamela Pape-Lindstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resources for Teaching and Assessing theCBE life sciences education · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marcy Peteroy-KellyDepartment of Biology, Pace University, NY, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4295-0875
Loretta Brancaccio-TarasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kingsborough Community College-CUNY, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America.
Judy Awong-TaylorDepartment of Biology, Georgia Gwinnett College, Lawrenceville, GA, United States of America.
Teresa BalserOffice of the Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Thomas JackDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States of America.
Sara LindsaySchool of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME, United States of America.
Kate MarleyDepartment of Biology, Doane University, Crete, NE, United States of America.
Sandra RomanoCollege of Science and Mathematics, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, Territory of the United States of America.
J Akif UzmanCollege of Sciences and Technology, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Pamela Pape-LindstromDivision of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math, Harford Community College, Bel Air, MD, United States of America.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2011 report, Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, provided the impetus to mobilize the undergraduate life sciences education community to affect change in order to enhance the educational experiences of life sciences majors. The work of the appointed Partnership for Undergraduate Life Sciences Education (PULSE) Vision and Change (V&C) Leadership Fellows has focused on the development of programs and resources to support departmental change. In this report, we present a qualitative assessment of several documents generated from the PULSE V&C Leadership Fellow Recognition Team. The Recognition Team developed two initiatives to provide departments with feedback on their change process. The first initiative, the validated PULSE V&C Rubrics, enables departments to collaboratively self-assess their progress in enacting change. The second initiative, the PULSE Recognition Program, involves completion of the aforementioned Rubrics and a site-visit by two Recognition Team members to provide external insights and suggestions to foster a department's change process. Eight departments participated in the Recognition Program in 2014. An evaluation of the documents yielded from the Recognition Program review of seven of the eight departments and a comparison of Rubric scores from before and three years following the site-visits uncovered several common elements required for successful department level change. These elements include an institutional culture that values and supports excellence in teaching and learning with resources and infrastructure, a departmental emphasis on program and course level assessment, and, most importantly, a departmental champion who actively supports endeavors that enhance teaching excellence.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementLeadershipProgram DevelopmentTotal Quality ManagementBiological Science DisciplinesHumansProgram EvaluationStaff Development

Identifiers

PMID31145735
PMCPMC6542552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.