Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145692›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2019

Integrating Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Education.

Boas Pucker, Hanna Marie Schilbert, Sina Franziska Schumacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data literacy in genome research.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing.Research integrity and peer review · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boas PuckerGenetics and Genomics of Plants, CeBiTec and Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7471
Hanna Marie SchilbertGenetics and Genomics of Plants, CeBiTec and Faculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-7753
Sina Franziska SchumacherBielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1471-1287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined awareness about the power and limitations of bioinformatics and molecular biology enables advanced research based on high-throughput data. Despite an increasing demand of scientists with a combined background in both fields, the education of dry and wet lab subjects are often still separated. This work describes an example of integrated education with a focus on genomics and transcriptomics. Participants learned computational and molecular biology methods in the same practical course. Peer-review was applied as a teaching method to foster cooperative learning of students with heterogeneous backgrounds. The positive evaluation results indicate that this approach was accepted by the participants and would likely be suitable for wider scale application.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleMolecular Biologybioinformaticsgenome assemblygenome researchmolecular biologyNGSRNA-Seqsequencing technologiesteachingtranscriptome assemblyvariant calling

Identifiers

PMID31145692
PMCPMC6798849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.