ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019
A Comparison of Behavioral Methods for Indexing the Auditory Processing of Temporal Fine Structure Cues.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Repeatability of an Abbreviated Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Test Battery.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Article
- A Characterization of Central Auditory Processing in Parkinson's Disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- Validation of the adaptive scan method in the quest for time-efficient methods of testing auditory processes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation is Limited Centrally.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Development and validation of a Spanish-language spatial release from masking task in a Mexican population.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Remote auditory assessment using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) and participant-owned devices.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Relating Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Abilities to Speech Understanding in Competition.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Training with an auditory perceptual learning game transfers to speech in competition.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022Article
- Clinical Importance of Binaural Information: Extending Auditory Assessment in Clinical Populations Using a Portable Testing Platform.American journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Temporal integration of monaural and dichotic frequency modulation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) for auditory assessment: Validation in a young adult normal-hearing population.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Age-Related Deficits in Electrophysiological and Behavioral Measures of Binaural Temporal Processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities.Trends in hearingArticle
- At-Home Auditory Assessment Using Portable Automated Rapid Testing (PART) to Understand Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Growing evidence supports the inclusion of perceptual tests that quantify the processing of temporal fine structure (TFS) in clinical hearing assessment. Many tasks have been used to evaluate TFS in the laboratory that vary greatly in the stimuli used and whether the judgments require monaural or binaural comparisons of TFS. The purpose of this study was to compare laboratory measures of TFS for inclusion in a battery of suprathreshold auditory tests. A subset of available TFS tasks were selected on the basis of potential clinical utility and were evaluated using metrics that focus on characteristics important for clinical use. Method TFS measures were implemented in replication of studies that demonstrated clinical utility. Monaural, diotic, and dichotic measures were evaluated in 11 young listeners with normal hearing. Measures included frequency modulation (FM) tasks, harmonic frequency shift detection, interaural phase difference (TFS-low frequency), interaural time difference (ITD), monaural gap duration discrimination, and tone detection in noise with and without a difference in interaural phase (N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.