Observational studyCancer science2019
Clinical significance of the LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen assay for prostate cancer detection.
Observational study in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive biochemical insights into derivatives of PSA and glycosylation-specific changes in PSA: role in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
- Altered Glycosylation of PSA in Prostate Cancer Tissue.The Prostate · 2025Article
- Glycomics in Human Diseases and Its Emerging Role in Biomarker Discovery.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Analytical and Real-World Clinical Characterization of S2,3PSA% Test in MRI Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Population.The Prostate · 2025Article
- N-Acetylated Monosaccharides and Derived Glycan Structures Occurring in N- and O-Glycans During Prostate Cancer Development.Cancers · 2024Review
- Glycan Profiling in Small Extracellular Vesicles with a SERS Microfluidic Biosensor Identifies Early Malignant Development in Lung Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Decoding the glycoproteome: a new frontier for biomarker discovery in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Urinary miRNAs and Prostate Cancer: Is there a Crossover Point Eventually, and where should we Head?Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Seminal Plasma Glycoproteins as Potential Ligands of Lectins Engaged in Immunity Regulation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Characteristics of α2,3-sialyl N-glycosylated PSA as a biomarker for clinically significant prostate cancer in men with elevated PSA level.The Prostate · 2021Article
- Prospects and Challenges of the Study of Anti-Glycan Antibodies and Microbiota for the Monitoring of Gastrointestinal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
- Glycoproteins Presenting Galactose andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Narrative review of urinary glycan biomarkers in prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Characterisation of the main PSA glycoforms in aggressive prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Impact of the Proportion of Biopsy Positive Core in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence in Patients with Pathological Pt2 and Negative Resection Margin Status after Radical Prostatectomy.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Study of glycosylation of prostate-specific antigen secreted by cancer tissue-originated spheroids reveals new candidates for prostate cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Serum N-glycan profiling is a potential biomarker for castration-resistant prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Clinical significance of the LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen assay for prostate cancer detection.Cancer science · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies (Pbx), better discrimination is needed. To identify clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) we determined the performance of LacdiNAc-glycosylated prostate-specific antigen (LDN-PSA) and LDN-PSA normalized by prostate volume (LDN-PSAD). We retrospectively measured LDN-PSA, total PSA (tPSA), and free PSA/tPSA (F/T PSA) values in 718 men who underwent a Pbx in 3 academic urology clinics in Japan and Canada (Pbx cohort) and in 174 PC patients who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy in Australia (preop-PSA cohort). The assays were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and decision curve analyses to discriminate CSPC. In the Pbx cohort, LDN-PSAD (AUC 0.860) provided significantly better clinical performance for discriminating CSPC compared with LDN-PSA (AUC 0.827, P = 0.0024), PSAD (AUC 0.809, P < 0.0001), tPSA (AUC 0.712, P < 0.0001), and F/T PSA (AUC 0.661, P < 0.0001). The decision curve analysis showed that using a risk threshold of 20% and adding LDN-PSA and LDN-PSAD to the base model (age, digital rectal examination status, tPSA, and F/T PSA) permitted avoidance of even more biopsies without missing CSPC (9.89% and 18.11%, respectively vs 2.23% [base model]). In the preop-PSA cohort, LDN-PSA values positively correlated with tumor volume and tPSA and were significantly higher in pT3, pathological Gleason score ≥ 7. Limitations include limited sample size, retrospective nature, and no family history information prior to biopsy. LacdiNAc-glycosylated PSA is significantly better than the conventional PSA test in identifying patients with CSPC. This study was approved by the ethics committee of each institution ("The Study about Carbohydrate Structure Change in Urological Disease"; approval no. 2014-195).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.