ArticleJAMA2019
Emergence of Hybrid Models of Genetic Testing Beyond Direct-to-Consumer or Traditional Labs.
Article in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sharing behavior and health care utilization following direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review.Open research Europe · 2025Pooled it
- Consumer Experiences and Perceptions of Genetic Counseling in Provider-Mediated Genetic Testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Article
- Physician-mediated genetic testing is direct to consumer in all but name.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Public Perspectives on Direct-to-Consumer Testing Oversight.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
- Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Review
- Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Influence of payer coverage and out-of-pocket costs on ordering of NGS panel tests for hereditary cancer in diverse settings.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Article
- Laboratory business models and practices: implications for availability and access to germline genetic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021Article
- Physician-guided, hybrid genetic testing exerts promising effects on health-related behavior without compromising quality of life.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020Review
- Evaluating Web-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests for Cancer Susceptibility.JCO precision oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.