Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145351›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Fluoroscopic evaluation of the influence of needle gauge on epidural spread in caudal block.

Woo Seog Sim, Hue Jung Park, Ji Hye Kwon, Min Seok Oh, Hyun Joo Jung, Min Kyoung Cho, Jin Young Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woo Seog SimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Hue Jung ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hye KwonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Min Seok OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Hyun Joo JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Min Kyoung ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Jin Young LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caudal block has limited injectate distribution to the desired lumbar level due to the relatively long distance from the injection site and reduction in the volume of injectate due to leakage into the sacral foramen. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of needle gauge on fluoroscopic epidural spread and to assess the correlation between the spread level and analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing caudal block. We retrospectively analyzed data from 80 patients who received caudal block for lower back and radicular pain. We categorized patients based on the epidural needle gauge used into group A (23 gauge), group B (20 gauge), and group C (17 gauge). Fluoroscopic image of the final level of contrast injected through the caudal needle and pain scores before the block and 30 minutes after the block recorded using a numerical rating scale, were evaluated. Of the 80 patients assessed for eligibility, 7 were excluded. Thus, a total of 73 patients were finally analyzed. Age, sex, body mass index, diagnosis, lesion level, lesion severity, and duration of pain did not differ among the 3 groups. All patients showed cephalic spread of contrast. Contrast spread beyond L5 was seen in 26.9% of patients in group A, 41.7% in group B, 39.1% in group C, and 35.6% overall; there was no significant difference among the groups (P = .517). Analgesic efficacy was not significantly different among the groups (P = .336). The needle gauge did not influence the level of epidural spread or analgesic efficacy in caudal block.

Indexed as

NeedlesAgedAnesthesia, CaudalEpidural SpaceFemaleFluoroscopyHumansInjections, EpiduralLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockRadiculopathyRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31145351
PMCPMC6709147
OpenAlexW2947298864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.