SynthesisMedicine2019
Adverse events of benralizumab in moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of biologics for patients with severe asthma: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Adverse events of anti-IL-5 drugs in patients with eosinophilic asthma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence-based assessments.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Refractory Food Protein-Induced Allergic Proctocolitis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biologic Therapies for Severe Asthma: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative Insights on IL-5 Targeting with Mepolizumab and Benralizumab: Enhancing EGPA Treatment Strategies.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Benralizumab for adults with rare and off-label eosinophilic disorders: a 52-week prospective, single-center study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Biologics in allergology and clinical immunology: Update on therapies for atopic diseases, urticaria, and angioedema and on safety aspects focusing on hypersensitivity reactions.Allergologie select · 2024Review
- Anti-IL-5 biologics and rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre 500 patient year exposure analysis.RMD open · 2023Article
- Severe Asthma and Biological Therapies: Now and the Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The evolving landscape of immunotherapy for the treatment of allergic conditions.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Biologic Therapies for Asthma and Allergic Disease: Past, Present, and Future.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Role of Benralizumab in Eosinophilic Immune Dysfunctions: A Case Report-Based Literature Review.Case reports in medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of biological therapies on patients with Type-2 high asthma and comorbid obesity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- The regulatory role of eosinophils in viral, bacterial, and fungal infections.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022Review
- Non-infective cystitis secondary to benralizumab immunotherapy.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
- Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) are important in typical type 2 immune-mediated diseases and an essential therapeutic target.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Review
- Emerging Evidence for Pleiotropism of Eosinophils.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Development of Rheumatoid Arthritis During Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in a Patient with Refractory Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenralizumab, a humanized, anti-interleukin-5 (anti-IL-5) receptor α monoclonal antibody that directly and rapidly depletes eosinophils, has shown significant efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations and improving lung function in moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma patients. However, there is some controversy regarding the adverse events (AEs) of benralizumab and a comprehensive analysis of these AEs has not been performed. This study aimed to assess the incidence of these AEs in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsWe searched for RCTs in the Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases that compared benralizumab with placebo in moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma patients. The outcome was the incidence of AEs during the observation period.
resultsEight RCTs were analyzed in this study. Patients treated with benralizumab had a lower risk of overall AEs (risk ratio (RR) 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.98), serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68-0.98), asthma exacerbation (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85), bronchitis (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.96) and sinusitis (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.85), but had a higher risk of headache (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.87) and pyrexia (RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.32-3.87) than patients treated with placebo. No increased incidence of death, hypersensitivity, injection-site reactions, nasopharyngitis, rhinitis, upper respiratory tract infection, influenza, cough, nausea, back pain or arthralgia was observed with benralizumab compared with placebo.
conclusionsBenralizumab reduced the risk of SAEs, asthma exacerbation, bronchitis and sinusitis, and aggravated the risk of headache and pyrexia. Other AEs were comparable between the benralizumab group and placebo group. Therefore, benralizumab is a relatively safe drug, but vigilance regarding AEs is imperative during long-term treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.