Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31145226›Full record

Trial reportFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery2020

Comparing Ketorolac With Ibuprofen for Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Denicia S Dwarica, Stephanie D Pickett, Yan D Zhao, Mikio A Nihira, Lieschen H Quiroz

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Single-dose intravenous ibuprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Single-dose intravenous ketorolac for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denicia S DwaricaFrom the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Stephanie D PickettDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Mercy Hospital, Edmond.
Yan D ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
Mikio A NihiraSchool of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA.
Lieschen H QuirozDivision of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USCHI Health Mercy Council Bluffs · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JENNIFER DAVID PECK · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to identify differences in pain perception and satisfaction with pain control in women receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs postoperatively.

methodsThis was a prospective, randomized controlled trial including urogynecology surgical patients. After surgery, all patients were randomized to receive either intravenous (IV) ketorolac or ibuprofen. The patients completed 3 visual analog scales (VAS) assessing pain at rest, pain with ambulation, and satisfaction with pain control. Postoperative opioid use was also measured.

resultsA total of 224 patients (112 in each arm) were included. Pain scores (SD) at rest in all patients who received ketorolac versus those who received ibuprofen was 2.30 (2.1) versus 2.68 (2.34) (P = 0.20). Pain scores (SD) with ambulation was 3.94 (2.57) versus 4.16 (2.73) (P = 0.57) in patients who received ketorolac and ibuprofen, respectively. Patients who received ketorolac rated their satisfaction with their pain regimen similarly to those who received ibuprofen (P = 0.50). The average amount (SD) of hydromorphone used in the ketorolac and ibuprofen arm was 3.68 (4.58) mg and 4.04 (4.97) mg, respectively (P = 0.58). A subgroup analysis based on type of surgery showed decreased pain at rest (VAS, 2.77 vs 4.88; P = 0.04) and increased satisfaction (VAS, 1.69 vs 4.67; P = 0.003) in patients who had laparotomy and received ketorolac.

conclusionsThere was no difference in pain and satisfaction with IV ketorolac compared with IV ibuprofen in patients who underwent all modalities of urogynecologic surgery. A subgroup of patients who underwent laparotomy had less pain with ketorolac.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHumansIbuprofenKetorolacMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofenKetorolac

Identifiers

PMID31145226
PMCPMC6881528
OpenAlexW2947974498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.