Improving rapid response system performance in a Chinese Joint Commission International Hospital.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. What Evidence is Available on Rapid Response Systems Across Europe? Findings From a Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2025
   Article
2. Retraction.The Journal of international medical research · 2025
   Article
3. Rapid Response Teams in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Critical care science · 2025
   Article
4. The Effects of Quality Assurance System Implementation on Work Well-Being and Patient Safety: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023
   Article
5. A rapid response team is associated with reduced overall hospital mortality in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a 9-year cohort study.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as