Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2019

Triple therapy with low-dose dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus dual therapy with each monocomponent, all added to metformin, in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Julio Rosenstock, Shira Perl, Eva Johnsson, Ricardo García-Sánchez, Stephan Jacob

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 3 cells of the map: it . It reports registered trial NCT02681094. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
3cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-0.510 · no effect
Glycemic controlfavours the treatment · head-to-head · obesity, t2dfeeds 3 cells of the map
Δ -0.51P = .0009
Triple therapy significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose (-1.5 mmol/L vs. -1.1 mmol/L [dapagliflozin; P = .0135] vs. -0.7 mmol/L [saxagliptin; P < .0001]) and body weight (-2.0 kg vs. -0.4 kg [saxagliptin; P < .0001]), and β-hydroxybutyrate levels were lower than with dapagliflozin plus metformin (mean difference -0.51; P = .0009).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

DPP-4 inhibitors×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 59 favour the treatment, 19 find no difference, 24 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.82replicated · 56 families support, 12 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.82This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper905 enrolled · 2016
Δ -0.51
NCT015282542,004 enrolled · 2012
Slope -0.02-0.05 to 0.00
NCT026078651,864 enrolled · 2016
Δ -0.50-0.60 to -0.40
NCT001216671,462 enrolled · 2005
Δ -0.73-0.92 to -0.53
NCT040178321,441 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.20-0.30 to -0.10
NCT011066771,284 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.62-0.76 to -0.48
NCT016060071,282 enrolled · 2012
Δ -0.27-0.48 to -0.05
NCT004827291,246 enrolled · 2007
Δ -0.60-0.78 to -0.43
NCT020991101,233 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.46-0.63 to -0.30
NCT019301881,231 enrolled · 2013
Δ -1.06-1.21 to -0.91
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.71-0.87 to -0.55
NCT022730501,136 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.21-0.41 to -0.02
NCT004499301,050 enrolled · 2007
Δ 0.140.06 to 0.21

Metformin×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 42 favour the treatment, 12 find no difference, 7 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.84replicated · 32 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.72-0.95 to -0.48
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.40-0.59 to -0.21
NCT022730501,136 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.89-1.08 to -0.69
NCT008598981,093 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.53-0.74 to -0.32
Δ -0.85-43.8 to 26.7
NCT00643851994 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.86-1.11 to -0.62
NCT01708902876 enrolled · 2012
Δ -1.00-1.23 to -0.78
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.05-0.26 to 0.17
NCT01126580807 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.22-0.36 to -0.08
NCT01023581784 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.67-0.96 to -0.37
NCT01076088744 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.84-1.15 to -0.52
NCT00386100688 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.49-0.67 to -0.30

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

SGLT2 inhibitors×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 80 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 4 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.92replicated · 69 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.92This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper905 enrolled · 2016
Δ -0.51
NCT010326294,330 enrolled · 2009
Δ 2.79-1.57 to 7.15
NCT011374742,996 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.46-0.59 to -0.33
NCT011956622,245 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.61-0.76 to -0.46
NCT010956661,484 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.59-0.76 to -0.42
NCT009688121,452 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.01-0.11 to 0.09
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.33-0.56 to -0.10
NCT011066771,284 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.62-0.76 to -0.48
NCT016060071,282 enrolled · 2012
Δ -0.59-0.81 to -0.37
NCT006732311,240 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.45-0.59 to -0.31
NCT020991101,233 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.43-0.60 to -0.27
NCT006609071,217 enrolled · 2008
Δ 0.00-0.11 to 0.11
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.46-0.66 to -0.27
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02681094 phase3completed

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled , Parallel Group, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Saxagliptin 5mg Co-administered With Dapagliflozin 5mg Compared to Saxagliptin 5mg or Dapagliflozin 5mg All Given as Add-on Therapy to Metformin inPatients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Metformin Alone

Ran2016Enrolled905Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons7ConditionsInadequate Glycaemic Control, Type 2 Diabetes MellitusArmsdapagliflozin, Placebo for dapagliflozin, Placebo for saxagliptin, Saxagliptin
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Safety of SGLT2 Versus DPP4 Inhibitors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julio RosenstockDallas Diabetes Research Centre at Medical City, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8324-3275
Shira PerlAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Eva JohnssonAstraZeneca Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.
Ricardo García-SánchezAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Stephan JacobCardio-Metabolic Institute, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEDallas Diabetes Research Center · USNephrologisches Zentrum Villingen-Schwenningen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with low-dose dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin added to metformin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis 24-week, double-blind trial (NCT02681094) randomized 883 patients (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5-10.0%) on metformin ≥1500 mg/d to add-on dapagliflozin 5 mg/d plus saxagliptin 5 mg/d or to add-on of either monocomponent. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline.

resultsBaseline mean ± SD patient characteristics were: age 56.7 ± 10.5 years; HbA1c 8.2 ± 0.9%; and diabetes duration 7.6 ± 6.1 years. Triple therapy significantly decreased HbA1c versus dual therapy (-1.03% vs. -0.63% [dapagliflozin] vs. -0.69% [saxagliptin]; P < .0001). More patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% with triple versus dual therapy (41.6% vs. 21.8% [dapagliflozin; P < .0001] vs. 29.8% [saxagliptin; P = .0018]). Triple therapy significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose (-1.5 mmol/L vs. -1.1 mmol/L [dapagliflozin; P = .0135] vs. -0.7 mmol/L [saxagliptin; P < .0001]) and body weight (-2.0 kg vs. -0.4 kg [saxagliptin; P < .0001]), and β-hydroxybutyrate levels were lower than with dapagliflozin plus metformin (mean difference -0.51; P = .0009). Urinary tract/genital infections and hypoglycaemia occurred in <5.0% and 5.8% of patients, respectively, with triple therapy.

conclusionsTriple therapy with once-daily dapagliflozin 5 mg, saxagliptin 5 mg and metformin significantly improved glycaemic control versus dual therapy with either agent added to metformin in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, and was generally well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdamantaneBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseBody WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DipeptidesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucosidesHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedAdamantaneBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucosedapagliflozinDipeptidesGlucosidesHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminsaxagliptindapagliflozinmetforminphase III studyrandomized trialSGLT2 inhibitortype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31144431
PMCPMC6771748
OpenAlexW2946852000

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.