Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144243›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Staphylococcus lugdunensis: antimicrobial susceptibility and optimal treatment options.

Lana Taha, Marc Stegger, Bo Söderquist

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of macrolide-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Methicillin-resistantFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Clinical case reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Kidney medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Manuka honey as a non-antibiotic alternative againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Searching for Virulence Factors amongInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pediatric investigation · 2022
    Article
  17. AnAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lana TahaSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Marc SteggerDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo SöderquistSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. bo.soderquist@oru.se.
Örebro University · SEStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus lugdunensis is a coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) with unusual pathogenicity resembling that of S. aureus. Unlike other CoNS, S. lugdunensis remains susceptible to most antibiotics. The resistance to penicillin varies widely (range, 15-87% worldwide), whereas methicillin resistance is still rare. We aimed to evaluate treatment options for infections caused by S. lugdunensis and more specifically to investigate whether penicillin G could be a better treatment choice than oxacillin. Susceptibility testing was performed using the disc diffusion method for penicillin G, cefoxitin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, norfloxacin, fusidic acid, rifampicin, and fosfomycin. Isolates susceptible to penicillin G were further tested with a gradient test for penicillin G and oxacillin. Of the 540 clinical isolates tested, 74.6% were susceptible to penicillin G. Among these penicillin-susceptible isolates, the MIC

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug Resistance, BacterialOxacillinPenicillin GStaphylococcus lugdunensisSwedenWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsOxacillinPenicillin GAntibiotic susceptibility testingOxacillinPenicillin GStaphylococcus lugdunensis

Identifiers

PMID31144243
PMCPMC6647525
OpenAlexW2947175835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.