Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144228›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2021

Mechanical dyssynchrony: How do we measure it, what it means, and what we can do about it.

Marat Fudim, Frederik Dalgaard, Mouhammad Fathallah, Ami E Iskandrian, Salvator Borges-Neto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of dyssynchrony with nuclear cardiac imaging: New evidence for an old parameter.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Prognostic value of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with left ventricular aneurysm: A comparative study of medical and surgical treatment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Utility of diastolic dyssynchrony in the setting of cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Mechanical dyssynchrony & CRT: Is it time for guideline updates?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marat FudimDuke University Medical Center, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. marat.fudim@gmail.com.
Frederik DalgaardDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Mouhammad FathallahUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ami E IskandrianDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Salvator Borges-NetoDuke University Medical Center, Duke University, 2301 Erwin Road, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEART &VASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007101 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, NEIL J. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) is defined by a difference in the timing of mechanical contraction or relaxation between different segments of the left ventricle (LV). Mechanical dyssynchrony is distinct from electrical dyssynchrony as measured by QRS duration and has been of increasing interest due to its association with worse prognosis and potential role in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Although echocardiography is the most used modality to assess LVMD, some limitations apply to this modality. Compared to echo-based modalities, nuclear imaging by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has clear advantages in evaluating systolic and diastolic LVMD. GSPECT MPI can determine systolic and diastolic mechanical dyssynchrony by the variability in the timing in which different LV segments contract or relax, which has prognostic impact in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure. As such, by targeting mechanical dyssynchrony instead of electrical dyssynchrony, GSPECT MPI can potentially improve patient selection for CRT. So far, few studies have investigated the role of diastolic dyssynchrony, but recent evidence seems to suggest high prevalence and more prognostic impact than previously recognized. In the present review, we provide an oversight of mechanical dyssynchrony.

Indexed as

Mechanical PhenomenaAgedArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisWeights and MeasuresCardiomyopathydyssynchronySPECT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.