Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144204›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2019

The effect of team collaboration and continuity of care on health and disability among rehabilitation patients: a longitudinal survey-based study from western Norway.

Merethe Hustoft, Eva Biringer, Sturla Gjesdal, Vegard Pihl Moen, Jörg Aβmus, Øystein Hetlevik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merethe HustoftCentre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. merethe.hustoft@helse-bergen.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6304-9280
Eva BiringerSection of Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Local Health Authority, Haugesund/Stord, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0933-1079
Sturla GjesdalDepartment of Global Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3971-767X
Vegard Pihl MoenCentre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation in Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7063-0049
Jörg AβmusCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-8556
Øystein HetlevikDepartment of Global Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-3426
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOWestern Norway Regional Health Authority · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate how changes in patient-rated health and disability from baseline to after rehabilitation were associated with communication and relationships in rehabilitation teams and patient-rated continuity of care.

methodsLinear models were used to assess the associations between relational coordination [RC] and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire-Norwegian version [NCQ-N] with changes in the World Health Association Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS 2.0] and EuroQol EQ-VAS [EQ-VAS]. To express change in WHODAS 2.0 and EQ-VAS, the model was adjusted for WHODAS 2.0 and EQ-VAS baseline scores. Analyses for possible slopes for the various diagnosis groups were performed.

resultsA sample of 701 patients were included in the patient cohort, followed from before rehabilitation to 1 year after a rehabilitation stay involving treatment by 15 different interprofessional teams. The analyses revealed associations between continuity of care and changes in patient-rated health, measured with EQ-VAS (all p values < 0.01). RC communication was associated with more improvement in functioning in neoplasms patient group, compared to improvement of health among included patient groups. The results revealed no associations between NCQ-N and WHODAS 2.0 global score, or between RC in the rehabilitation teams treating the patients and changes in WHODAS 2.0 global score.

conclusionThe current results revealed that better personal, team and cross-boundary continuity of rehabilitation care was associated with better patient health after rehabilitation at 1-year follow-up. Measures of patient experiences with different types of continuity of care may provide a promising indicator of the quality of rehabilitation care.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAdolescentAdultAgedContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultContinuity of patient careDisability evaluationInterprofessional relationsPatient-rated outcome measuresRehabilitationRelational coordination

Identifiers

PMID31144204
PMCPMC6761089
OpenAlexW2947336824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.