Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144191›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

A Cost-Utility Study of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Gallstones.

Jason M Sutherland, Janice Mok, Guiping Liu, Ahmer Karimuddin, Trafford Crump

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. How to Assess Health Gains.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ten years of IRCAD, Barretos, SP, Brazil.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2022
    Article
  8. Measuring the impact of delayed access to elective cholecystectomy through patient's cost-utility: an observational cohort study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2021
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason M SutherlandCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jason.sutherland@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1857-2432
Janice MokCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Guiping LiuCentre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ahmer KarimuddinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Trafford CrumpDepartment of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume surgery that is an end-stage treatment for gallstones. There is little understanding of the surgery's effect on the gain in patients' health relative to its cost. The objective of this study is to measure health gain, cost and cost utility of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsParticipants completed the EQ-5D(3L) pre-operatively and post-operatively. Quality adjusted life years attributable to cholecystectomy were calculated by comparing health state utility values between the pre- and post-operative time points. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost was calculated from a health system perspective and included hospital and specialists' fees (in 2016 Canadian dollars). Cost per QALY was calculated for the entire sample and demographic sub-groups.

resultsThe cohort consisted of 135 participants who completed surveys between February 2013 and June 2017. The response rate among eligible patients was 50%. Assuming that health gain accrued to the participant for 25 years after cholecystectomy, the mean gain in QALYs was 1.7430, corresponding to an average cost per QALY of $2102. Older patients, on average, had less gain in QALYs than younger patients.

conclusionLaparoscopic cholecystectomies are inexpensive relative to the gains in health they provide patients. The gains in health were not uniform across age categories. These results should provide health system planners confidence that incremental increases in surgical capacity for elective cholecystectomies is beneficial.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallstonesCanadaCholecystectomyCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCost-utilityGallstonesLaparoscopic cholecystectomyQuality-adjusted life years

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.