Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144173›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

A pilot survey of ventilated cancer patients' perspectives and recollections of early mobility in the intensive care unit.

Steven H Hsu, Claudine Campbell, Amanda K Weeks, Maryann Herklotz, Natalie Kostelecky, Stephen M Pastores, Neil A Halpern, Louis P Voigt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven H HsuCritical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite C-1179, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5587-7844
Claudine CampbellDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Amanda K WeeksDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Maryann HerklotzDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Natalie KosteleckyCritical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite C-1179, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Stephen M PastoresCritical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite C-1179, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Neil A HalpernCritical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite C-1179, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Louis P VoigtCritical Care Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite C-1179, New York, NY, 10065, USA. voigtl@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the level of recall, satisfaction, and perceived benefits of early mobility (EM) among ventilated cancer patients after extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsA survey of patients' perceptions and recollections of EM was administered within 72 h of extubation. Data on recall of EM participation, activities achieved, adequacy of staffing and rest periods, strength to participate, activity level of difficulty, satisfaction with staff instructions, breathing management, and overall rating of the experience were analyzed. The Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) was used for delirium screening.

resultsFifty-four patients comprised the study group. Nearly 90% reported satisfaction with instructions, staffing, rest periods, and breathing management during EM. Participants indicated that EM maintained their strength (67%) and gave them control over their recovery (61%); a minority felt optimistic (37%) and safe (22%). Patients who achieved more sessions and "out-of-bed" exercises had better recall of actual activities compared with those who exercised in bed. Overall, patients with CAM-ICU-positive results (33%) performed less physical and occupational therapy exercises.

conclusionsVentilated cancer patients reported an overall positive EM experience, but factual memory impairment of EM activities was common. These findings highlight the needs and the importance of shaping strategies to deliver a more patient focused EM experience.

Indexed as

AdultAirway ExtubationExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMemory DisordersMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsRange of Motion, ArticularRespiration, ArtificialSurveys and QuestionnairesEarly mobilityMechanical ventilationMemory recallPerceptionSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31144173
PMCPMC7223790
OpenAlexW2947304255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.