ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020
Usefulness of Kinect sensor-based reachable workspace system for assessing upper extremity dysfunction in breast cancer patients.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Xbox 360 Kinect-based virtual reality training as effective as standard physiotherapy in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Trial
- Advanced Clinical-Based Technologies for Monitoring Physical Function in Breast Cancer Survivors: Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Patient Experiences of Rehabilitation and the Potential for an mHealth System with Biofeedback After Breast Cancer Surgery: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRecently, the utility of the Kinect sensor-based reachable workspace analysis system for measuring upper extremity outcomes of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases has been demonstrated. Here, we investigated its usefulness for assessing upper extremity dysfunction in breast cancer patients.
methodsTwenty unilateral breast cancer patients were enrolled. Upper extremity active range of motion was captured by the Kinect sensor, and reachable workspace relative surface areas (RSAs) were obtained. The QuickDASH was completed to assess upper extremity disability. General and breast cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) were assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23.
resultsThe total RSA ratio of the affected and unaffected sides ranges from 0.64 to 1.11. Total RSA was significantly reduced on the affected versus unaffected side (0.659 ± 0.105 vs. 0.762 ± 0.065; p = 0.001). Quadrant 1 and 3 RSAs were significantly reduced (0.135 ± 0.039 vs. 0.183 ± 0.040, p < 0.001; 0.172 ± 0.058 vs. 0.217 ± 0.031, p = 0.006). Total RSA of the affected side was strongly correlated with the numeric pain rating scale during movement (r = - 0.812, p < 0.001) and moderately with the QuickDASH (r = - 0.494, p = 0.027). Further, quadrant 3 RSA was correlated with EORTC QLQ-C30 role functioning (r = 0.576, p = 0.008) and EORTC QLQ-BR23 arm symptoms (r = - 0.588, p = 0.006) scales.
conclusionsThe Kinect sensor-based reachable workspace analysis system was effectively applied to assess upper extremity dysfunction in breast cancer patients. This system could potentially serve as a quick and simple outcome measure that provides quantitative data for breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31144172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.