ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019
Exceptional pemetrexed sensitivity can predict therapeutic benefit from subsequent chemotherapy in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Prognosis Model of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Based on Max-Min Hill-Climbing Algorithm.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Human drug efflux transporter ABCC5 confers acquired resistance to pemetrexed in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Therapeutic efficacy and imaging assessment of the HER2-targeting chemotherapy drug ZInvestigational new drugs · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBased on an exceptionally durable response to pemetrexed observed in some patients with metastatic NSCLC, the predictive value of pemetrexed sensitivity to outcomes of subsequent systemic treatment was investigated.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the patients with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC treated with pemetrexed monotherapy as their first- or second-line chemotherapy between November 2006 and February 2015. Good (top 5% longest) and poor responders (bottom 12% shortest) were defined according to the duration of pemetrexed maintenance. The first and second post-pemetrexed (PP) systemic treatments were defined as PP1 and PP2 therapies, respectively, to define their progression-free survivals (PFS) as PFS1 and PFS2.
resultsIn a total of 100 patients, 86% of patients received pemetrexed as their second-line chemotherapy, and 34% were classified as good responders. Good and poor responder groups showed 20.5 months and 0.7 months of the median duration of responses, respectively. PP1 and PP2 therapies were done in 74% and 41.9% of patients after failure to pemetrexed. To our surprise, disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in the good responder group than poor responder group (69.6% vs 37.3%, p = 0.010) in patients treated with PP1 therapy, and median PFS1 was also significantly longer (5.2 vs 2.2 months, p < 0.01) regardless of the type of subsequent systemic treatment. Meanwhile, pemetrexed sensitivity did not affect DCR or PFS of patients who received PP2 therapies.
conclusionsPatients who achieved durable response to pemetrexed might obtain greater therapeutic benefits from subsequent systemic treatment in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without targets, which could potentiate more effective post-pemetrexed treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.