Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31144153›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2019

Face Recognition.

Steven Z Rapcsak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perception gap of aged facial appearance; self-perception is younger than actual status due to angle of viewing.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Getting to Know You: Emerging Neural Representations during Face Familiarization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven Z RapcsakDepartment of Neurology, University of Arizona, 1501. N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. szr@u.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFunctional imaging studies, intracranial recordings, and lesion-deficit correlations in neurological patients have produced unique insights into the cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates of face recognition. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the field and integrate data from these complementary lines of research to propose a functional neuroanatomical model of face identity recognition. RECENT

findingsRather than being localized to a single specialized cortical region, face recognition is supported by a distributed neural network. Core components of the network include face-selective visual areas in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex, whereas the extended network is comprised of anterior temporal lobe structures involved in the retrieval of multimodal identity-specific knowledge about familiar individuals, the amygdala responsible for generating emotional responses to faces, and prefrontal regions that provide top-down executive control of the recognition process. Damage to different network components results in neuropsychological disorders of face identity processing manifested either as impaired recognition of familiar faces (prosopagnosia, person recognition disorders) or as false recognition/misidentification of unfamiliar faces. Face identity recognition requires the coordinated activity of a large-scale neural network. Neurological damage can compromise the structural/functional integrity of specific network nodes or their connections and give rise to face recognition disorders with distinct clinical features and underlying cognitive mechanisms determined primarily by the location of the lesion.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProsopagnosiaTemporal LobeFace recognitionFalse recognition/misidentificationPerson recognition disordersProsopagnosia

Identifiers

PMID31144153
OpenAlexW4210968786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.